This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Intellectual Property
Patent Infringement
Patent Validity

Enovsys LLC v. Nextel Communications Inc., et al.

Published: Jun. 14, 2008 | Result Date: May 16, 2008 | Filing Date: Jan. 1, 1900 |

Case number: CV-06-5306 Verdict –  $2,782,830

Court

USDC Central


Attorneys

Plaintiff

Gregory S. Dovel
(Dovel & Luner LLP)

Jeff Eichmann


Defendant

Randall E. Kay
(Jones Day)

John Allcock
(DLA Piper LLP )


Facts

Plaintiff, California intellectual property holding company Enovsys LLC, sued Sprint Nextel and various affiliates for infringement of two patents. The patents related to privacy systems used to manage cell phone location based services. Plaintiff is privately owned by inventor Fomukong. Formukong and Denzil Chezney applied for the first of the patents in 1997, before location services were first offered for cell phones.

Plaintiff contended defendant's wireless networks used the patents in managing the disclosure of the precise location of a user's cell phone.

Result

Verdict for $2,782,831. The jury found infringement on both patents and upheld the validity of the patents.

Other Information

FILING DATE: Aug. 23, 2006.

Deliberation

6.5 hours

Length

seven days


#103000

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390