This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Torts
Assault and Battery
False Imprisonment

Brown v. Super Buy

Published: May 6, 2000 | Result Date: Feb. 12, 2000 | Filing Date: Jan. 1, 1900 |

Case number: BC198880 Verdict –  $0

Judge

Marlene A. Kristovich

Court

L.A. Superior Central


Attorneys

Plaintiff

Alan R. Freedman


Defendant

Robert W. Armstrong II
(Demler, Armstrong & Rowland LLP)

Jack D. Hoskins


Experts

Defendant

Donald E. Rierson
(technical)

Facts

Plaintiff Elaine Brown claimed that she was wrongfully detained at the Super Buy Market, handcuffed and forced
to wait in a cold storage room for two hours before the police arrived and she was released.
She also claimed that she advised the defendants that her three children were waiting in a car in the parking lot
and that no one checked on the children or brought them into the store.
The plaintiffs sued for assault, battery, intentional infliction of emotional distress and false imprisonment.
The defendants contended that Elaine Brown was lawfully detained after she verbally and physically assaulted
a store clerk that had refused to accept food stamps which did not have matching registration numbers.
The defendants also contended that the method and manner of the arrest was appropriate and that there was no
obligation to check on plaintiffÆs children.
The defendants claimed that plaintiff admitted that store employees inquired as to the location of her car and
told her that the children were being checked on, and argued that this was circumstantial evidence that
plaintiffÆs request was complied with, although the specific employee that did the checking was never
identified.
The defendants also disputed plaintiffÆs contention that she was forced to wait for two hours after she was
initially detained and that they were not responsible for the delay by the police department in responding to the
incident report.

Settlement Discussions

The plaintiff demanded $180,000, reduced to $75,000, later reduced to $15,000 at the settlement conference. The defendants made a C.C.P. Section 998 offers of $2,500 at the settlement conference.

Damages

The plaintiff claimed $2,175 in medical expenses

Injuries

The plaintiff suffered emotional distress.

Deliberation

four hours

Poll

12-0

Length

six days


#103049

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390