This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.


Employment Law
Wrongful Termination
Breach of Contract, Retaliation

Darlene Hoyt v. Career Systems Development, Monika Spinks and Eugene Harris

Published: Dec. 4, 2010 | Result Date: Sep. 13, 2010 | Filing Date: Jan. 1, 1900 |

Case number: 3:07-cv-01733-BEN -RBB Verdict –  Defense

Court

USDC Southern District of California


Attorneys

Plaintiff

H. Paul Kondrick


Defendant

Jonathan Andrews
(Signature Resolution)

Shauna L. Durrant


Experts

Plaintiff

Gene Konrad
(technical)

Defendant

Dana A. Basney
(technical)

Facts

Darlene Hoyt worked as an independent contractor for Career Systems Development Corp. (CSDC), providing services at the San Diego Job Corps Center. In October 2006, CSDC notified Hoyt that it had received approval from the Dept. of Labor to hire a full-time mental health professional rather than a part-time independent contractor, and as such, Hoyt's position was going to be terminated. On Jan. 26, 2007, after 20 years, Hoyt's mental health consultant position was terminated.

Hoyt filed suit against CSDC, as well as various directors of the company, alleging wrongful termination, retaliation, racial discrimination, and breach of contract.

Contentions

PLAINTIFF'S CONTENTIONS:
Hoyt contended that although she was an exceptional employee, she was forced to work in an increasingly hostile environment, subject to harassment, retaliation, and discrimination because of her race, and eventually terminated.

She alleged that she was discriminated against because she was not black, like her two supervisors, and also alleged that black contractors received favorable treatment and raises.

Hoyt claimed that she was informed her termination was financial, even though CSDC hired a full-time mental health consultant, and that when she interviewed for the job, the interview was hostile.

DEFENDANTS' CONTENTIONS:
CSDC contended that Hoyt's contract was terminated pursuant to its terms, which specified that either party could terminate for any reason, with notice. CSDC further contended that Hoyt was notified verbally and in writing, and that it encouraged Hoyt to apply for the full-time position, but Hoyt decided not to interview.

CSDC claimed that Hoyt's wrongful termination claim was meritless due to her status as an independent contractor, and that she could not establish her termination was race-based.

Damages

Hoyt sought $1 million in damages for emotional distress and lost earnings.

Result

The jury rendered a verdict in favor of CSDC.


#104147

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390