This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Torts
Malicious Prosecution
Trademark Dilution

Stewart Resnick, Lynda Resnick, Franklin Mint Co. v. Manatt, Phelps & Phillips, Mark Lee

Published: Feb. 26, 2011 | Result Date: Jan. 21, 2011 | Filing Date: Jan. 1, 1900 |

Case number: BC285388 Settlement –  $25,000,000

Court

L.A. Superior Central


Attorneys

Plaintiff

Michael C. Small

Andrew S. Clare
(Loeb & Loeb LLP)

Lawrence B. Gutcho

Edward P. Lazarus

L. Rachel Helyar

Rex S. Heinke
(California Appellate Law Group )

William A. Norris


Defendant

Dean E. Dennis
(Hill, Farrer & Burrill LLP)

Brad D. Brian
(Munger, Tolles & Olson LLP)

David M. Axelrad
(Horvitz & Levy LLP)

Kevin H. Brogan
(Hill, Farrer & Burrill LLP)

Neil D. Martin

Frederic D. Cohen

John A. Taylor Jr.

Michael R. Doyen
(Munger, Tolles & Olson LLP)


Facts

In 1998, on behalf of its client, The Diana Fund, Manatt, Phelps and Phillips, a Los Angeles law firm, filed an action against Stewart and Lynda Resnick, Roll International Corp., and Franklin Mint Co., alleging trademark dilution and false advertising in relation to the sale of Princess Diana memorabilia. The lawsuit was dismissed in 2000, and the Resnicks filed an action against Manatt, The Diana Fund, and Manatt partner Mark Lee, alleging malicious prosecution. Later, a Court of Appeal decision allowed arguments on the malicious prosecution claim.

Contentions

PLAINTIFF'S CONTENTIONS:
Plaintiffs argued that defendants did not have probable cause for the original claims and that no reasonable attorney would believe so. Plaintiffs alleged that the lawsuit was an intentional effort to deteriorate sales of Princess Diana memorabilia.

Result

The parties reached a settlement, whereby defendant agreed to pay $25 million to plaintiffs.


#104389

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390