This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

CONFIDENTIAL

Feb. 12, 2011

Personal Injury
Premises Liability
School Negligence

Confidential

Verdict –  Defense

Court

Riverside Superior


Attorneys

Plaintiff

Ugochukwu O. Asobie


Defendant

Scott D. Buchholz
(Dummit, Buchholz & Trapp)


Experts

Plaintiff

Charles Niesen M.D.
(medical)

Lorne S. Label M.D.
(medical)

Defendant

Perry R. Lubens M.D.
(medical)

David Karlin
(medical)

Facts

Plaintiff, an autistic child, attended defendant's school for special needs children. On Sept. 23, 2004, while attending classes, plaintiff began exhibiting irritable behavior related to his autism. Plaintiff was placed unattended behind closed doors, which led to the plaintiff suffering an injury to his face.

Contentions

PLAINTIFF'S CONTENTIONS:
Plaintiff contended that the defendants were negligent in not having a teacher present in the classroom at the time of the incident. Further, the instructional assistant who placed the plaintiff behind the closed door breached defendants' policies and procedures and further failed to follow the plaintiff's behavioral support plan regarding responding to plaintiff's irritable behaviors. Plaintiff maintained that the injury suffered to the plaintiffs face and head led to recurrent seizure activity and life long epilepsy.

DEFENDANTS' CONTENTIONS:
Defendants disputed that its staff acted negligently. Defense argued that plaintiff's aggressive behavior required its staff to act emergently in placing him away from other students in a room where he would not harm students or staff. Defendant argued that the post incident seizure activity related to plaintiff's underlying autism diagnosis and that plaintiff's medical history as well as out of court statements indicated a pre-existing history of seizure activity that have yet to have been diagnosed as same.

Settlement Discussions

Plaintiff demanded $2 million. Defendant offered $2,500.

Injuries

Recurrent seizure activity/epilepsy including need for future treatment/medications as well as injury to face.

Result

Defense verdict.

Other Information

The matter has resolved via a confidential settlement post trial. FILING DATE: Dec. 13, 2005.

Deliberation

one hour

Length

six days


#104394

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390