This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Antitrust
Sherman Antitrust Act

Thomas Laumann, Fernanda Garber, Robert Silver, Garrett Traub, David Dillon, and Peter Herman, representing themselves and all others similarly situated v. National Hockey League, NHL Enterprises LP, NHL Interactive Cyberenterprises LLC, New York Rangers Hockey Club, New Jersey Devils LLC, New York Islanders Hockey Club LP, Comcast-Spectator LP, Li

Published: Jul. 25, 2015 | Result Date: Jun. 15, 2015 | Filing Date: Jan. 1, 1900 |

Case number: 1:12-cv-01817-SAS Settlement –  Equitable Settlement

Facts

Thomas Laumann, Fernanda Garber, Robert Silver, Garrett Traub, David Dillon, and Peter Herman, representing themselves and all others similarly situated sued the National Hockey League, NHL Enterprises LP, NHL Interactive Cyberenterprises LLC, New York Rangers Hockey Club, New Jersey Devils LLC, New York Islanders Hockey Club LP, Comcast-Spectator LP, Lincoln Hockey LLC, Lemieux Group LP, Hockey Western New York LLC, Chicago Blackhawks Hockey Team Inc., San Jose Sharks LLC, Directv LLC, Directv Sports Networks LLC, Root Sports Pittsburgh, Comcast Corp., Comcast Sportsnet Philadelphia LP, Comcast Sportsnet Mid-Atlantic LP, Comcast Sportsnet California LLC, Comcast Sportsnet Chicago LLC, and Madison Square Garden Co. relating to alleged anticompetitive behavior.

Contentions

PLAINTIFFS' CONTENTIONS:
A class of purchasers of out of market sports packages contended that the owners of the National Hockey League teams entered into a series of agreements that eliminated, restricted, and prevented competition in the distribution of live men's hockey games over the Internet and television. They allegedly did this by dividing the market into exclusive territories, which were protected by anticompetitive blackouts. As a result, subscribers were overcharged for certain hockey games. Plaintiffs brought a class action alleging antitrust violations under the Sherman Act.

Result

A proposed settlement was preliminarily approved that would give subscribers better prices and more choices. It also reduces prices for all out of market packages. It would also allow subscribers to subscribe to individual team subscriptions at significant additional discounts, rather than being required to purchase a bundle of all NHL out of market games of all teams.


#105082

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390