This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Intellectual Property
Trademark Infringement
False Designation of Origin

National Grange of the Order of Patrons of Husbandry v. California State Grange

Published: Aug. 22, 2015 | Result Date: Jul. 14, 2015 | Filing Date: Jan. 1, 1900 |

Case number: 2:14-cv-00676-WBS-DAD Bench Decision –  Permanent Injunction

Court

USDC Eastern


Attorneys

Plaintiff

Stephen G. Larson
(Larson LLP)

James L. Bikoff

David K. Heasley

Randall A. Brater

Michael L. Turrill
(Hogan Lovells US LLP)


Defendant

Anthony J. Ellrod
(Manning & Kass Ellrod Ramirez Trester LLP)


Facts

The National Grange of the Order of Patrons of Husbandry filed a trademark infringement claim against the California State Grange.

Contentions

PLAINTIFF'S CONTENTIONS:
Plaintiff, a national fraternal agricultural organization founded in 1867, contended that it had registered numerous trademarks that featured the word "Grange," used for associational, educational, and advocacy activities. Plaintiffs accused defendant, which plaintiff chartered as its affiliate state-level chapter, but later revoked the charter due to a dispute. Plaintiff requested defendant to cease and desist from using the word "Grange." Nevertheless, defendant continued to use the word by referring to itself as "California State Grange," thereby infringing on plaintiff's trademark. As such, plaintiff sued defendant under the Lanham Act for trademark infringement, unfair competition and false designation of origin, trademark dilution, and trademark counterfeiting.

DEFENDANT'S CONTENTIONS:
Defendant denied plaintiff's allegations and asserted numerous affirmative defenses. Defendant also filed counterclaims seeking a declaratory judgment that plaintiff's trademark is invalid.

Result

National Grange moved for summary judgment on its first two claims while California State Grange moved for summary judgment on all of National Grange's claims as well as its counterclaims. Ultimately, the court granted summary judgment in favor of National Grange as to two of its claims and denied California State Grange's motion. Consequently, California State Grange was permanently enjoined from using the word "Grange." National Grange may proceed to litigate its remaining claims.

Other Information

FILING DATE: March 12, 2014.


#105173

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390