This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Employment Law
Wage and Hour
Failure to Provide Accurate Itemized Wage Statements, Unpaid Wages

Juan Chavajay v. Frank Upender Chopras; Chopras Restaurant Inc., dba Karma Indian Cuisine, also dba Moksha Restaurant Bar & Lounge, also dba Clay Oven Indian Cuisine, and also dba Venus Banquet Hall; and Does 1 through 20, inclusive

Published: Sep. 5, 2015 | Result Date: Mar. 10, 2015 | Filing Date: Jan. 1, 1900 |

Case number: BC538944 Bench Decision –  $24,640

Court

L.A. Superior Central


Attorneys

Plaintiff

Ramin R. Younessi
(The Law Offices of Ramin R. Younessi)


Defendant

Brandon R. Creel
(State Compensation Insurance Fund)

William C. Kersten
(Kersten & Associates)


Facts

Juan Chavajay sued Frank Chopras and Chopras Restaurant Inc. dba Karma Indian Cuisine dba Moksha Restaurant Bar & Lounge dba Clay Oven Indian Cuisine and dba Venus Banquet Hall, in connection with alleged unpaid wages.

Contentions

PLAINTIFF'S CONTENTIONS:
Plaintiff began working for defendants as a busboy in November 2011. Plaintiff, who was paid in cash, alleged he earned between $2.90 and $5.38 per hour and worked approximately 60 to 69 hours per week. Plaintiff contended that the payment he received was way below the minimum wage. He eventually left the position in December 2012. Plaintiff then sued Chopra, who owned the operating company for the restaurants he worked at for violating labor laws by failing to pay minimum wage, failing to pay overtime hours, failing to pay wages, failing to provide rest periods, failing to provide itemized wage statements, failing to pay split shit premium, and unfair competition. Plaintiff also alleged a Private Attorney General Act violation.

DEFENDANTS' CONTENTIONS:
Defendants disputed plaintiff's allegations, maintaining that plaintiff was properly paid for the time plaintiff worked.

Result

The court found in favor of Chavajay in a bench trial and awarded him $24,640 in total damages, which included $10,348 in unpaid minimum wages, $4,650 in unpaid overtime wages, 42,970 in waiting time penalties, $2,262 in prejudgment interest, $1,620 in rest periods that were not provided, $1,440 in split shift pay that was not provided, and $1,350 in itemized wage statements that were not provided.

Other Information

FILING DATE: March 11, 2014.


#105295

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390