This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Torts
Negligence
Negligent Misrepresentation, Breach of Contract

Sempra Energy v. Marsh USA Inc.

Published: Jan. 3, 2009 | Result Date: Oct. 27, 2008 | Filing Date: Jan. 1, 1900 |

Case number: 207-cv-05431-SJO-SS Verdict –  $48,500,000

Court

USDC Central


Attorneys

Plaintiff

Sandra S. Thayer

Kirk A. Pasich
(Pasich LLP)


Defendant

Christopher J. St. Jeanos

Mitchell J. Auslander

David M. Roberts


Experts

Plaintiff

Manuel A. Abdala
(technical)

Alberto Bianchi
(technical)

Richard Masters
(technical)

Winifred Baker
(technical)

Cruz Reynoso
(technical)

Defendant

Peter Rukavina
(technical)

Facts

In 1996, Marsh USA obtained a political risk insurance policy for Sempra Energy from National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, PA to protect Sempra's investment in two Argentine natural gas distribution companies. The policy provided $48.5 million in coverage. In 2002, the Argentine government stripped the Argentine gas companies of many of their operating rights, devastating the value of Sempra's investment. Sempra's insurance carrier denied coverage for Sempra's loss, and the parties proceeded to arbitration. The arbitrators denied Sempra's claim for insurance coverage, finding that the policy did not cover intangible assets (the operating rights) or currency devaluation.

Sempra filed an action against March for professional negligence, negligent misrepresentation and breach of contract.

Contentions

PLAINTIFF'S CONTENTIONS:
Sempra claimed that it relied on Marsh's expertise to obtain coverage; that it orally contracted with Marsh to acquire insurance; and that Marsh failed to meet the standard of care.

DEFENDANT'S CONTENTIONS:
Marsh asserted that it did not breach the standard of care and plaintiff's claims were barred by the statute of limitations.

Damages

Sempra requested $48.5 million in damages, plus interest and $3.8 million in attorney fees.

Result

The jury awarded Sempra $48.5 million.


#105672

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390