This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Contracts
Fraud
Account Stated

DeVries American LLC v. Yellow Cab Cooperative Inc.

Published: Sep. 10, 2005 | Result Date: Jul. 15, 2005 | Filing Date: Jan. 1, 1900 |

Case number: 317759 Bench Decision –  $112,788

Judge

Curtis E.A. Karnow

Court

San Francisco Superior


Attorneys

Plaintiff

Joseph M. Breall
(Breall & Breall LLP)


Defendant

Mark S. Cornwall

Philip S. Ward


Facts

Plaintiff DeVries American LLC was the third-party claims administrator for defendant Yellow Cab Cooperative
Inc. Each time the plaintiff closed a claim file, it billed defendant about $205. The plaintiff usually had
between 200 and 600 open files.
In May 2000, the parties discussed plans to end their relationship. The plaintiff demanded $250,000 to close all
open files. The defendant refused to pay, stating it was unhappy with the plaintiff's services, which it alleged
had undergone a precipitous decline. According to the plaintiff, the defendant orally agreed to pay it $125,000
if the plaintiff would continue to work on and close files until July 1, 2000 (about one month). Upon entering
into this agreement, the defendant would pay $50,000, and would pay the balance of $75,000 on July 1.
The plaintiff was also to provide a statistical summary of the defendant's losses over the preceding five years. The
defendant paid the initial $50,000, but refused to pay more.

Settlement Discussions

The plaintiff made a demand of $40,000 (C.C.P. Section 998); defendant's offer was $15,000.

Damages

The plaintiff demanded $75,000, the amount owed under the contract. In the alternative, it sought quantum meruit relief, claiming payment of $250,000 for all work completed since defendant's last payment, calculated in the manner used prior to the agreement.

Result

The trial judge found there was a valid oral contract between the parties and that plaintiff substantially performed under it. He awarded the plaintiff $75,000, the amount owed under the agreement, plus $37,787 in prejudgment interest. The judge denied the plaintiff's fraud claim and its claim for payment on all outstanding files, as the parties had reached a novation when they entered into the agreement.


#106353

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390