This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

CONFIDENTIAL

May 13, 2003

Personal Injury
Automobile Accident
Wrongful Death

Confidential

Settlement –  $700,000

Judge

Marlene A. Kristovich

Court

L.A. Superior Compton


Attorneys

Plaintiff

Richard B. Koskoff


Defendant

Andrea E. Ross
(Office of the Los Angeles County Counsel)


Experts

Plaintiff

Jacob E. Tauber M.D.
(medical)

Stephen A. Blewett
(technical)

Defendant

John Hochman
(medical)

Jon B. Landerville P.E.
(technical)

A. Jubin Merati Ph.D.
(technical)

Facts

The plaintiffs, one of whom was a minor, brought a wrongful death action against the defendants for the death of their mother who was the common law wife of the co-plaintiff. The decedent was the sole passenger in a pick-up truck driven by the co-plaintiff who was westbound on Walnut Avenue in the City of Compton. An 18-wheel big rig traveling eastbound on the same street made a left turn in front of the plaintiff's pick-up truck, causing the plaintiff to swerve to avoid a collision. As a consequence, the plaintiff's vehicle struck a tree head-on.

Settlement Discussions

Settlement at $750,000.

Damages

Funeral and burial expenses totaled approximately $10,000.

Injuries

The plaintiff driver suffered a broken sternum and small facial lacerations. The plaintiffs, the children of the decedent, suffered loss of affection, comfort and society of their mother.

Other Information

The co-plaintiff driver, who was physically injured in the accident, claimed that he was entitled to recover emotional distress damages as a direct victim for witnessing the death of the decedent, to whom he was not married. The plaintiff relied on Long v. PKS Inc. (1993) 12 Cal.App.4th 1293, which held that a plaintiff who suffers physical injuries in an accident that results in the death of a loved one may recover emotional distress damages even though the plaintiff and the decedent were not closely related. The plaintiff also relied on Burgess v. Superior Court (1992) 2 Cal. 4th 1064. Under the direct victim rule of Burgess and Long, the requirement of closely related (marriage) is not a threshold element that must be proved in order for a physically injured plaintiff to recover emotional distress damages for the loss of a loved one.


#106626

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390