This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Personal Injury (Non-Vehicular)
Professional Negligence
Medical Malpractice

Iacovino v. The Regents of the University of California and Franklin Hoaglund, M.D.

Published: Apr. 10, 1999 | Result Date: Mar. 10, 1999 | Filing Date: Jan. 1, 1900 |

Case number: 990430 Verdict –  $166,000

Judge

A. James Robertson

Court

San Francisco Superior


Attorneys

Plaintiff

Gary R. Cloutier


Defendant

Michael T. Lucey
(Gordon & Rees LLP)


Experts

Plaintiff

Michael Sension
(medical)

Martin Blinder M.D.
(medical)

Michael Giordano
(medical)

Robert McConnell
(medical)

Defendant

James V. Luck
(medical)

Facts

Plaintiff Iacovino, an HIV positive man, had vascular necrosis in his shoulders for two years. He was referred to defendant Dr. Franklin Hoaglund for a consultation for total shoulder replacement surgery. Dr. Hoaglund told the plaintiff that his risk of post-operative infection was severe due to low T-cells and wrote "no operation candiate due to CD-4 count" on a referral for physical therapy; and told the plaintiff "hope for a cure" regarding his HIV status when asked what plaintiff would do without surgery. When plaintiff saw Dr. Hoaglund, he was taking high doses of Morphine for pain and Prednisone for AIDS-related asthma. The plaintiff sued for violation of Unruh Act, medical malpractice and intentional infliction of emotional distress.

Settlement Discussions

The plaintiff made a settlement demand of $200,000 (as per plaintiff), $980,000 (as per defendant). The defendants offered to settle for $120,000.

Other Information

The verdict was reached approximately one year and five months after the case was filed. EXPERT TESTIMONY: The plaintiff's expert testified that any T-cell (including zero) was not a contraindication for major surgery. The defendants' expert testified that patients with compromised immunological systems, like those who are HIV positive, are at significant increased risk of late post-operative infection following total shoulder replacement surgery, which may lead to additional surgery to remove the implant and a condition called a "flail shoulder."

Deliberation

1½ days

Poll

10-2 (malpractice), 9-3 (discrimination)

Length

nine days


#106923

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390