This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Personal Injury (Vehicular)
Auto v. Auto
Negligence

Thomas Curtis Tucker v. Stanley Edward Goldich

Published: Apr. 17, 1999 | Result Date: Feb. 26, 1999 | Filing Date: Jan. 1, 1900 |

Case number: SC046627 c/w 96T04174 –  $17,400

Judge

Patricia L. Collins

Court

L.A. Superior Santa Monica


Attorneys

Plaintiff

William C. Hudson Jr.

Stanley H. Rozanski


Defendant

Shahin Karim

Penelope D. Doherty


Experts

Plaintiff

Casey Yoo
(medical)

Arthur Kreitenberg M.D.
(medical)

Daniel H. Lee
(medical)

Defendant

Henry W. Lubow M.D.
(medical)

Chadwick E. Smith
(medical)

Facts

On March 31, 1996, at 10:30 p.m., plaintiff Tae Eo was on his way home from work when his vehicle stalled in the No. 1 lane on Olympic near Centinela Avenue. Tucker was directly behind Eo and Goldich was behind Tucker. Liability was in dispute as there were conflicting reports as to whether Goldich hit Tucker first and pushed him into Eo's car or if Tucker first hit Eo and then Goldich rear ended Tucker. The plaintiff brought this action against the defendant based on negligence. Per the defendant, the plaintiff testified he felt only one impact.

Settlement Discussions

The plaintiff º998 settlement demand of $5,000. Defendant Tucker made a C.C.P. º998 offer of compromise of $3,500 to Eo, and defendant Goldich made no offers.

Specials in Evidence

$5,396.06

Other Information

Per the defendant, defendant Tucker also filed a separate lawsuit as plaintiff against defendant Goldich, and both cases were consolidated. Plaintiff Eo was found to be 0 percent liable, defendant Tucker was found to be 35 percent liable to Eo and defendant Goldich 65 percent liable. Plaintiff Tucker's verdict was $21,800. Defendant Goldich also cross-complained against Tucker for his property damage, but recovered nothing.

Deliberation

1½ days

Length

nine days


#106943

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390