This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Construction
Window Defects
Negligence

Steven L. Gallaher v. Milgrad Mfg./High Sierra Glass

Published: Apr. 24, 1999 | Result Date: Jan. 7, 1999 | Filing Date: Jan. 1, 1900 |

Case number: 97AS00931 –  $0

Judge

William M. Gallagher

Court

Sacramento Superior


Attorneys

Plaintiff

Thomas Archer


Defendant

Mark L. Hardy


Experts

Plaintiff

Jan E. Swaney
(technical)

Steven Gallaher
(technical)

Defendant

Ted Hart
(technical)

Randy Zumalt
(technical)

Facts

In approximately August 1994, plaintiffs purchased a set of dual-pane aluminum frame windows from a local glazier, High Sierra Glass (HSG), for installation in approximately 4,000 sq. ft. residence that sits atop the Sierra mountains overlooking Donner Lake. Milgard manufactured the windows sold by HSG. The home, at its location, is subject to severe wind and weather conditions. Over the course of several winters, the original plus three replacement sets of windows installed by Milgrad continued to leak and to deflect under the severe conditions. Water intrusion caused resultant property damage to the walls, floor, floor coverings, and home furnishings.

Settlement Discussions

The plaintiff issued a settlement demand for $125,000. The defendant made a C.C.P. º998 offer for $37,501.

Damages

Repair costs represented to the jury in the amount of approximately $185,000. The plaintiff's claim for emotional distress was dismissed. The plaintiff also submitted a claim for loss of use in an amount approaching $55,000.

Injuries

Residuals

Other Information

The verdict was reached approximately 19 months after the case was filed. By motion in Limine, the court refused instruction and evidence on claims for emotional distress. By nonsuit, the court dismissed claims for nuisance, breach of contract and breach of implied warranties, absent a showing of privity. The court did allow one claim for breach of express warranty based upn defendant's "lifetime guarantee". Additionally, instruction on both negligence and strict liability were submitted to the jury.

Deliberation

10 hours

Length

13 days


#106962

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390