This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Personal Injury (Vehicular)
Auto v. Auto
Negligence

Kelly Bill v. Armstrong Roofing

Published: Mar. 8, 2001 | Result Date: Sep. 8, 2000 | Filing Date: Jan. 1, 1900 |

Case number: 803879 Verdict –  $317,000

Judge

Jane D. Myers

Court

Orange Superior


Attorneys

Plaintiff

Jeffrey R. Billings
(Law Offices Larry H. Parker)


Defendant

Gerald Gress

Thomas B. Cummings


Experts

Plaintiff

Gary L. Wyatt
(medical)

Kim Lawler
(medical)

Mayer W. Schames
(medical)

William M. Goodman
(medical)

Defendant

Larry J. Moore
(medical)

Eron J. Martin
(medical)

Facts

On Jan. 11, 1998, plaintiff Kelly Bill, 41, was rear-ended on the 57 freeway by a truck driven by defendant
Santos Ramirez and owned by him employer, Armstrong Roofing. Ramirez admitted that he was at fault for
the collision and that he was an employee in the course and scope of his employment at the time of the
accident.
Eight months later, on Sept. 10, 1998, Bill was involved in a second accident when her vehicle was rear-ended
by defendant Jill Warino. Warino contested liability at the time of trial. However, a motion for directed verdict
was granted to plaintiff at the conclusion of the evidence.
The plaintiff alleged that she sustained soft tissue injuries, as well as internal derangement of the right TM
joint as a result of the first accident. Additionally, plaintiff maintained that the second accident aggravated the
right TM joint injury and caused a new injury in the left TM joint. The plaintiff underwent physical therapy for
these injuries after both accidents and eventually underwent two surgeries to each TM joint.
The first round of surgeries consisted of arthroscopic procedures, while the second round involved an
arthroscopic procedure on the left TM joint and an open joint surgery on the right TM joint. The plaintiff had a
very good recovery after the second round of surgeries.

Settlement Discussions

Prior to trial, defendant Armstrong made a C.C.P. Section 998 demand of $50,000 while defendant Warino offered policy limits of $30,000 for a global settlement offer of $80,000. Prior to trial at the MSC, plaintiff indicated that she would accept the $250,000 the policy limits from Armstrong Roofing and the $30,000 policy limits from defendant Warino. The plaintiff was thus willing to accept $280,000 as a package. The plaintiff indicated that she would not settle with each defendant piecemeal. The matter was arbitrated by Nancy Oliver of Peterson, Oliver and Poll. The Armstrong defendants indicated that they were willing to pay the arbitration award of $34,000. However, defendant Warino did not make a settlement offer at the time of the MSC, claiming that there was no damage to the vehicles in this accident and that the accident couldnÆt have caused the injuries alleged by the plaintiff. On the day of trial, plaintiff made a settlement demand in the amount of $350,000.

Specials in Evidence

$78,000 $150,000

Injuries

The plaintiff alleged that she sustained soft tissue injuries, as well as internal derangement of the right TM joint as a result of the first accident. Additionally, plaintiff maintained that the second accident aggravated the right TM joint injury and caused a new injury in the left TM joint. The plaintiff underwent physical therapy for these injuries after both accidents and eventually underwent two surgeries to each TM joint. The first round of surgeries consisted of arthroscopic procedures, while the second round involved an arthroscopic procedure on the left TM joint and an open joint surgery on the right TM joint. The plaintiff had a very good recovery after the second round of surgeries.

Other Information

The jury determined that the Armstrong defendants were responsible for the past medical expenses of $66,427, future medical expenses of $36,000 and non-economic damages of $215,000, for a total judgment of $317,000. The jury also determined that defendant Warino was responsible for past medical expenses of $6,331, future medical expenses of $4,000 and non-economic damages of $10,000 for a total judgment of $20,331. The plaintiffÆs total verdict was thus $337,758. The plaintiffÆs total recovery was $373,523 inclusive of costs and prejudgment interest.

Deliberation

1.5 hours

Poll

12-0

Length

seven days


#107007

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390