This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Personal Injury
Product Liability
Defective Design

Dana Gambill v. Ford Motor Company

Published: Jun. 10, 2003 | Result Date: May 5, 2003 | Filing Date: Jan. 1, 1900 |

Case number: BC273552 Verdict –  $0

Judge

Ralph W. Dau

Court

L.A. Superior Central


Attorneys

Plaintiff

John A. Roberts

Charles Ted Mathews
(Mathews Law Group)


Defendant

Daniel S. Rodman
(Snell & Wilmer LLP)


Experts

Plaintiff

Ted Vavoulis
(technical)

Richard J. Hornick
(technical)

Lewis Collin Moore
(technical)

Defendant

Joseph P. Price
(technical)

Raphael Bell
(technical)

Elizabeth H. Raphael
(technical)

David J. Weiner M.B.A., AM
(technical)

Facts

On May 8, 2001, the plaintiff was exiting from her 1999 Ford Explorer sport when she struck her bare right ankle against the exposed end of the seat track for the driver's seat. The plaintiff claims she suffered a laceration and a nerve injury which ultimately developed into reflex sympathetic dystrophy (RSD), a chronic and debilitating pain syndrome. The RSD eventually spread to all of her extremities, causing the plaintiff to have a spinal stimulator surgically implanted in her back to help her manage her pain. The plaintiff, who was a wedding photographer prior to the incident, also claimed the injury diminished her ability to work at the same level as prior to the injury.

Settlement Discussions

Prior to trial, the plaintiff demanded $4.5 million plus payment of all future medical expenses. Ford offered $20,000 to settle before trial.

Specials in Evidence

$200,000 $500,000 in excess of $500,000

Other Information

Ford has submitted a memorandum of costs to recover approximately $75,000 in costs and experts' fees. The plaintiff has filed a motion to tax costs and a notice of intent to file a motion for new trial.

Deliberation

two hours

Poll

12-0 (defense verdict on all causes of action)

Length

seven days


#107319

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390