This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

CONFIDENTIAL

Jun. 10, 2003

Personal Injury
Landlord and Tenant
Failure to Maintain

Confidential

Settlement –  $430,000

Judge

Mark J. Litwak

Court

Ventura Superior


Attorneys

Plaintiff

Dennis Neil Jones
(Myers, Widders, Gibson, Jones & Feingold LLP)


Defendant

John Dale Kerr


Experts

Plaintiff

James Craner
(medical)

Alan Forbess
(technical)

Facts

The plaintiffs, a family of six, rented a home in Camarillo, beginning in July 1998. They later noticed mold growing inside the residence, which they reported to the landlord. The landlord initially told the tenants to wipe the walls with a water and bleach mixture, then spray a product called "Expel" on the walls. Each time the tenants tried this, the mold returned. One day, visible mold was discovered on the infant plaintiff's bedding, dolls and clothing. Both adults and all four children developed respiratory problems. The children were diagnosed with asthma and testing revealed that all four children were allergic to mold. Eventually, the landlord hired an environmental professional who confirmed the presence of toxic mold in the house, the uninhabitability of the subject property and the need for extensive remediation. The landlord's insurance company agreed to pay for remediation of whatever personal property owned by the plaintiffs could be safely cleaned. Much of the family's clothing, bedding and furniture had to be thrown away. The landlord hired a remediation contractor to perform that remediation, at his insurance company's expense. After the plaintiffs moved into another home, their respiratory problems did not abate. They later discovered that their new residence had been cross-contaminated by a box of moldy videotapes that the remediation contractor had purportedly cleaned and cleared to be moved.

Settlement Discussions

The plaintiff made a policy limits demand of $300,000 to the landlords, which was accepted. The remaining $130,000 was paid on behalf of the landlord's remediation contractor.

Specials in Evidence

$20,000

Damages

$34,178 property damage to furniture and clothing and $41,000 rent reimbursement


#107326

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390