This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Contracts
Breach of Contract
Malicious Prosecution

Frances Kozin v. Giantceutical Inc., Jackson Wen

Published: Aug. 10, 2004 | Result Date: Jun. 4, 2004 | Filing Date: Jan. 1, 1900 |

Case number: BC296015 Verdict –  $121,736

Judge

David A. Workman

Court

L.A. Superior Central


Attorneys

Plaintiff

Michael J. Faber
(Law Offices of Michael J. Faber)


Defendant

Curtis C. Jung
(Jung & Yuen LLP)


Facts

The plaintiff was a 66-year-old marketing consultant for the defendant Giantceutical Inc., a manufacturer and supplier of nutritional supplements. Her contract ran for one year, commencing March 6, 2001, ending March 6, 2002. The plaintiff referred an acquaintance, Dr. Michael Nassar to the defendant, who retained Dr. Nassar also pursuant to a one-year contract. The defendants terminated Dr. Nassar's contract after several months, following which he sued them for breach of contract. The defendants thereafter terminated the plaintiff's contract in October 2001, with five months left to run. The plaintiff filed two separate complaints with the Labor Board. The first labor complaint for discrimination was dismissed for insufficient evidence. The second labor complaint for wages was settled in June 2002 for $3,000. In July 2002, the defendants sued the plaintiff and alleged fraud, professional negligence, breach of contract and equitable indemnity, alleging that the plaintiff was liable for their legal problems stemming from the termination of Dr. Nassar's contract. Demurrer's to the professional negligence and equitable indemnity causes of action were sustained without leave to amend, and demurrers to the fraud and breach of contract causes of action were sustained with leave to amend. The defendants thereupon voluntarily dismissed the lawsuit without prejudice. The plaintiffs thereupon sued the defendants alleging malicious prosecution and breach of contract.

Settlement Discussions

The plaintiff demanded $70,000 before trial; the defendant offered $20,000.

Damages

The plaintiff alleged $16,095 in contract damages; $5,640 in attorney fees and costs defending the underlying lawsuit and emotional distress damages for the five months that the lawsuit against her had been pending.

Result

Verdict for the plaintiff for $121,736 ($16,095 contract damages; $5,640 attorney fees and costs; $72,750 emotional distress damages; $27,250 punitive damages).

Deliberation

three days

Length

11 days


#107531

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390