This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Personal Injury
Medical Malpractice
Lack of Informed Consent

Burton S. Armus v. Good Samaritan Hospital, Michael Bellino, Joel M. Matta, Joel M. Matta, M.D. Inc.

Published: Aug. 10, 2004 | Result Date: Mar. 10, 2004 | Filing Date: Jan. 1, 1900 |

Case number: BC271710 Verdict –  $0

Judge

John P. Shook

Court

L.A. Superior Central


Attorneys

Plaintiff

James M. Kilkowski


Defendant

Jamie B. Skebba

Bradley C. Clark


Experts

Plaintiff

Mitchell J. Freedman
(technical)

John Toton
(medical)

Stu Billet
(technical)

Facts

Burton Armus, a 64-year-old writer and show producer, underwent hip surgery on Jan. 11, 2001, to remove a heterotopic ossification. Orthopedic surgeon Joel Matta performed the operation at Good Samaritan Hospital, assisted by Michael Bellino, his orthopedic surgery fellow. Armus' sciatic nerve was partially severed during the surgery, leaving him with a permanent disability. Bellino had signed an informed consent form the day of the surgery, indicating that he had discussed the risks of surgery with Armus. Armus also signed the form. Good Samaritan Hospital policy indicated that an informed consent form expires after 30 days.

Specials in Evidence

$2 million

Damages

Armus claimed that the injury prevented him from engaging in his employment as a showrunner, his primary source of income.

Injuries

Armus suffered a partial laceration of the sciatic nerve, which resulted in foot drop and the need to wear a brace.

Result

The jury found for Good Samaritan and Bellino, but could not decide whether the Matta defendants were liable. Defense counsel indicated that the jury reported that it was unable to decide on Matta's standard of care, but felt that Armus would have had the surgery regardless of his knowledge of the risk of nerve damage. Armus then dismissed the case against Matta and his practice for a waiver of costs.

Deliberation

two days

Poll

12-0 (Good Samaritan Hospital and Bellino), 7-5 (Matta defendants)

Length

six days


#107555

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390