This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

CONFIDENTIAL

Aug. 17, 2004

Banking
Fees
Class Action

Confidential

Settlement –  $33,000,000

Judge

Saundra B. Armstrong

Court

USDC Northern


Attorneys

Plaintiff

Derek G. Howard
(Derek G. Howard Law Firm)

Jerome B. Falk Jr.
(Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer LLP)

France Jaffe

Robert W. Mills

Gilmur R. Murray


Defendant

Robert A. Rosenfield

Matthew L. Larrabee
(Dechert LLP)

A. Mari Mazour


Experts

Plaintiff

William C. Sarsfield
(technical)

Facts

A class action complaint was filed on behalf of 6,500 trust beneficiaries alleging that from 1975 to 1993, Security Pacific National Bank, and then after a merger, Bank of America, overcharged $25 million in trustee fees to personal trusts. Bank of America refunded the overcharges and simple interest of $17 million before the suit. Thus the bank's total refund was over $42 million. After a bench trial in 1997, the presiding judge found in favor of Bank of America and held that simple interest was the appropriate remedy for compensatory damages. The suit requested punitive damages as well. In 2000, the parties entered into a partial settlement which resulted in the payment of $36.5 million in exchange for a release of the punitive damages claim, but not compensatory damages. This settlement expressly preserved the compensatory damages claim, and called for an appeal to the District Court's 1997 decision on those damages. In a published decision, the Ninth Circuit reversed the district court and ordered the Bank of America to disgorge all profits earned on the underlying fee overcharges Nickel v. Bank of America 9th Circuit 2002, 290 F. 3d 1134. Following additional proceedings on remand, the district court held that the criteria for measuring the bank's profits was based on the return on equity method. Subsequently, this second and final settlement was reached. On appeal, the bank was ordered to disgorge all profits earned on fee overcharges.

Settlement Discussions

Confidential

Damages

In prosecuting the compensatory damages appeal, the plaintiff sought to obtain the bank's profits on the underlying $25 million in trust overcharges. Under the terms of the settlement, any recovery was limited to one of two alternative amounts. As one alternative, if it was determined that there were additional compensatory damages owed in any amount up to $12.5 million, this would result in a damages recovery of $12.5 million. As a second alternative, if additional compensatory damages were found to be above the $12.5 million, the additional recovery would be capped at $40 million. When the bank's initial refund of over $42 million is combined with the total settlements of over $69.5 million, the total damages recovery totals over $111 million. Plaintiff counsel reports that this is the largest reported damages recovery involving fees charged to trust beneficiaries of personal trusts.

Result

$33,000,000


#107573

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390