This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Insurance
Wrongful Termination
Disability Benefits

Daniel A. Davidson v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company

Published: Oct. 15, 2005 | Result Date: Sep. 2, 2005 | Filing Date: Jan. 1, 1900 |

Case number: SACV041151DOC Bench Decision –  $100,000

Judge

David O. Carter

Court

USDC Central


Attorneys

Plaintiff

Gregory G. Brown
(Brown & Charbonneau LLP)


Defendant

Eric McDonough


Facts

Defendant Metropolitan Life Insurance Company (MetLife) terminated plaintiff Daniel A. Davidson's long term disability (LTD) benefits on Feb. 11, 2004. The plaintiff appealed the decision, but MetLife upheld the termination. The plaintiff filed suit on Oct. 4, 2004.

Contentions

PLAINTIFF CONTENTIONS:
The plaintiff contended that his LTD benefits were wrongfully terminated by MetLife. He contended that MetLife abused its discretion because it relied on a file review (instead of an examination) by a doctor who failed to adequately examine the plaintiff's physical condition before denying his LTD benefits; ignored or discounted the voluminous and credible medical evidence from the plaintiff's various treating physicians; and ignored his long history of surgeries. The means by which MetLife arrived at its ultimate decision were defective and included seven days of video surveillance, showing that the plaintiff's doctors' diagnosis of his physical limitations was correct. DEFENDANT

The plaintiff contended that his LTD benefits were wrongfully terminated by MetLife. He contended that MetLife abused its discretion because it relied on a file review (instead of an examination) by a doctor who failed to adequately examine the plaintiff's physical condition before denying his LTD benefits; ignored or discounted the voluminous and credible medical evidence from the plaintiff's various treating physicians; and ignored his long history of surgeries. The means by which MetLife arrived at its ultimate decision were defective and included seven days of video surveillance, showing that the plaintiff's doctors' diagnosis of his physical limitations was correct. DEFENDANT CONTENTIONS:
MetLife contended that it did not abuse its discretion when terminating the plaintiff's disability benefits and that it did everything that the law entitles it to do.

Settlement Discussions

The defendants offered $20,000.

Damages

The plaintiff sought past benefits of over $100,000, plus reinstatement of future benefits (estimated at $650,000), and attorney's fees and costs.

Result

After a half-day bench trial, the Court ordered reinstatement of the plaintiff's disability benefits, over $100,000 in benefits owed since the termination, plus attorney's fees and costs.


#107639

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390