This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Intellectual Property
Patent Infringement

Intouch Technologies Inc. v. Vgo Communications Inc.

Published: Dec. 22, 2012 | Result Date: Nov. 29, 2012 | Filing Date: Jan. 1, 1900 |

Case number: 2:2011-cv-09185 Verdict –  Defense

Court

USDC Central


Attorneys

Plaintiff

Irfan A. Lateef
(Knobbe Martens)

Joseph S. Cianfrani

Craig S. Summers

Brian C. Claassen


Defendant

Kevin E. Schraven
(Hankin Patent Law APC)

Marc B. Hankin

Patrick C. Quinlivan
(Tredway Lumsdaine & Doyle LLP)


Facts

InTouch Technologies Inc. sued VGo Communications Inc. for patent infringement. Both companies worked with robotic telepresence system and visual communications products.

Result

A jury found that VGo did not infringe InTouch's patents. The jury also found that two of InTouch's patents were invalid.


#107971

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390