This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Immigration
Civil Rights
Freedom of Information Act

National Immigration Law Center, ACLU Foundation of Southern California, National Lawyers Guild Los Angeles Chapter v. United States Department of Homeland Security and U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, an agency of the Department of Homeland Security

Published: Mar. 26, 2011 | Result Date: Jan. 31, 2011 | Filing Date: Jan. 1, 1900 |

Case number: 2:2008-cv-07092-DDP (VBKx) Bench Decision –  Dismissal

Court

USDC Central


Attorneys

Plaintiff

Jennifer L. Pasquarella
(ACLU Foundation of Southern California)

Katherine V.A. Smith
(Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP)

Karen C. Tumlin
(National Immigration Law Center)

Ahilan T. Arulanantham
(ACLU Foundation of Southern California)

Linton Joaquin
(National Immigration Law Center)

Maurice M. Suh
(Gibson Dunn & Crutcher LLP)

Ann S. Robinson

Nora A. Preciado


Defendant

John R. Tyler

Bryan Dearinger

Gregory G. Katsas


Facts

On Feb. 7, 2008, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) conducted a raid at the Micro Solutions Enterprises manufacturing plant in Van Nuys, California. Due to the raid, government agents interrogated and detained over 130 employees, but had arrest warrants for only eight individuals.

The National Immigration Law Center (NILC), the ACLU of Southern California, and the National Lawyers Guild of Los Angeles submitted a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request to the ICE and the Dept. Of Homeland Security (DHS), seeking documents related to potential discriminatory and unconstitutional conduct. The agencies did not release any documents in response to the request. Thus, the organizations sued the ICE and DHS for declaratory and injunctive relief based on the failure to release information.

Contentions

PLAINTIFFS' CONTENTIONS:
Plaintiffs claimed defendants violated 5 U.S.C. Section 552(a)(3)(A) by failing to punctually release records, and violated Section 552(a)(1) and (a)(2) by failing to make records accessible to the public.

Result

Plaintiffs dismissed the suit after defendants released over 2500 pages of requested documents, which revealed that government agents planned on arresting up to 200 workers and performed the raid based on an anonymous tip.


#107973

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390