This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Environmental Law
Injunctive Relief
Civil Penalties, Costs, and Supplemental Projects

The People of the State of California v. Target Corporation, a Minnesota Corporation, and Does 1 through 25, inclusive

Published: Mar. 19, 2011 | Result Date: Feb. 3, 2011 | Filing Date: Jan. 1, 1900 |

Case number: RG09457686 Settlement –  $22,500,000

Court

Alameda Superior


Attorneys

Plaintiff

Brett J. Morris

Elizabeth Ann Rushton

Edward H. Ochoa
(California Dept. of Justice)

Timothy R. Patterson


Defendant

Peter Hsiao
(King & Spalding LLP)

Purvi G. Patel
(Morrison & Foerster LLP)

David F. McDowell Jr.
(Morrison & Foerster LLP)

Andrew E. Monach

Harold J. McElhinny


Facts

In a coordinated statewide investigation commenced in 2006 by the Attorney General, 21 District Attorneys and two City Attorneys, the People of the State of California (People) investigated Target Corporation regarding potential environmental violations.

A civil suit was filed in June 2009, alleging illegal mismanagement and disposal of hazardous wastes at numerous Target locations throughout California. A preliminary injunction was issued in September 2010 to halt the illegal conduct.

Contentions

PLAINTIFF'S CONTENTIONS:
Pursuant to the California Health and Safety Code and the California Business and Professions Code, the People alleged that Target was liable for improperly storing, transporting and disposing of hazardous wastes on a continuing basis for several years, including causing hazardous wastes to be trucked to and dumped at municipal landfills not designed, licensed or equipped to handle hazardous wastes. The People also claimed that Target stored incompatible and combustible waste liquids improperly, resulting in an emergency response.

DEFENDANTS' CONTENTIONS:
Target denied any wrongdoing when the suit was filed. In the Final Judgment and Permanent Injunction on Consent, Target made no admissions regarding any issue of law or fact or any alleged violation of law.

Damages

The People sought preliminary and permanent injunctive relief and recovery of civil penalties, investigative and enforcement costs and other relief.

Result

The parties reached a settled approved by the court on March 2, 2011. A permanent injunction orders Target to comply with numerous state laws and regulations regarding the proper management and disposal of hazardous wastes. Target also must retain an independent auditor that will perform annual audits of all Target facilities in California, for three years, and report to the People the results of the audits, including any new violations. In addition, Target was ordered to pay a total of $22.5 million to settle the People's monetary claims. This sum includes civil penalties, costs and supplemental environmental projects funded by Target.


#108024

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390