This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Civil Rights
Due Process Violation
Breach of Duty, False Testimony

Caramad Conley v. City and County of San Francisco, Prentice Earl Sanders

Published: Sep. 13, 2014 | Result Date: Aug. 7, 2014 | Filing Date: Jan. 1, 1900 |

Case number: 3:12cv454 Settlement –  $3,500,000

Court

USDC Northern


Attorneys

Plaintiff

Rebekah Punak

Eric H. MacMichael
(Keker, Van Nest & Peters LLP)

Benita Brahmbhatt

Daniel E. Purcell


Defendant

Peter J. Keith
(Office of the San Francisco City Attorney)

Elizabeth M. Pederson

Cheryl S. Adams
(Office of the San Francisco City Attorney)

Vince G. Chhabria

Joshua S White
(Office of the City Attorney)


Facts

Caramad Conley sued the City and County of San Francisco and Prentice Earl Sanders, in connection with Conley's alleged wrongful murder convictions related to a 1989 drive-by shooting.

Contentions

PLAINTIFF'S CONTENTIONS:
Conley alleged that Sanders, one of the lead investigators in the underlying case against him, suppressed numerous pieces of material, exculpatory evidence related to the only alleged eyewitnesses to the crime. Conley alleged that Sanders had regularly paid one of those witnesses, Clifford Polk, and that these payments were not disclosed to the defense. Plaintiff claimed that Polk lied on the stand, denying he was paid, and Sanders failed to correct that false testimony.

Conley further alleged that Sanders had provided John Johnson, the other witness against him, and Johnson's wife with conjugal visits in an interrogation room at the San Francisco Police Dept.'s homicide detail. Plaintiff claimed that several witnesses corroborated these visits, and that the visits were never disclosed to Conley. Conley asserted a claim for civil rights violations, arguing that the suppressed evidence would have affected the credibility of these witnesses, and the testimony of the witnesses led directly to his conviction.

DEFENDANTS' CONTENTIONS:
Defendants denied that Sanders engaged in any misconduct and asserted qualified immunity.

Result

The parties reached a $3.5 million settlement during mediation.

Other Information

MEDIATOR: San Francisco County Superior Court Judge William J. Cahill, ret., of JAMS.


#108182

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390