This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Intellectual Property
Patent Infringement

Siemens AG v. Seagate Technology

Published: Jun. 20, 2009 | Result Date: Jan. 8, 2009 | Filing Date: Jan. 1, 1900 |

Case number: 06CV00788(JVS) Verdict –  Defense

Court

USDC Central


Attorneys

Plaintiff

Miriam Quinn

John A. O'Malley

Brandon C. Fernald
(Fernald Law Group APC)

Robert M. Chiaviello Jr.


Defendant

William C. Rooklidge

Calvin L. Litsey
(Faegre, Baker & Daniels LLP)

David J.F. Gross
(Faegre, Drinker, Biddle & Reath LLP)

Martha K. Gooding


Experts

Plaintiff

Sheldon L. Glashow
(technical)

Harry Manbeck
(technical)

Walter Bratic
(technical)

Defendant

Christopher H. Bajorek
(technical)

Caroline Ross
(technical)

Mark E. Nusbaum
(technical)

John C. Jarosz
(technical)

Shan Wang
(technical)

Facts

United States Patent No. 5,686,838 was issued on Nov. 11, 1997 for an invention called "Magnetoresistive Sensor Having at Least a Layer System and a Plurality of Measuring Contacts Disposed Thereon, and a Method of Producing the Sensor". This patent was assigned to plaintiff Siemens AG. Plaintiff alleged that defendant Seagate Technology's hard disk drives utilizing Giant Magneto Resistance (GMR) or Tunneling Giant Magneto Resistance (TGMR) read heads with an Artificial Antiferromagnet (AAF) infringed upon this patent.

Result

The district court granted summary judgment of non-infringement to defendant Seagate on the allegations relating to TGMR read heads. The jury issued a verdict for defendant Seagate on the remaining allegations, finding that the asserted claims of the patent were anticipated and rendered obvious by a prior invention by IBM, and further rendered obvious by other prior art.

Other Information

Siemens has appealed the case to the Federal Circuit. FILING DATE: April 23, 2007.

Length

18 days


#108653

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390