This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Personal Injury
Auto v. Auto

Sukhsagar Pannu, et al. v. Land Rover North America Inc., et al.

Published: Jun. 20, 2009 | Result Date: May 18, 2009 | Filing Date: Jan. 1, 1900 |

Case number: LC069992 Bench Decision –  $21,154,000

Court

L.A. Superior Van Nuys


Attorneys

Plaintiff

Garo Mardirossian
(Mardirossian & Associates Inc.)

Stanley K. Jacobs
(Jacobs & Jacobs LLP)

Armen K. Akaragian
(Mardirossian Akaragian LLP)


Defendant

Lee Mickus
(Evans Fears & Schuttert LLP)

Warren E. Platt
(Snell & Wilmer LLP)


Experts

Plaintiff

Brian Herbst
(technical)

Joseph L. Burton
(technical)

Ted M. Kobayashi
(technical)

John Marcosky
(technical)

Edward Heitzman
(technical)

Defendant

Lee C. Carr
(technical)

Christopher Hoyle
(technical)

Elizabeth H. Raphael
(technical)

Charles Hughes
(technical)

Jeffrey J. Croteau
(technical)

Terrance McGowan
(technical)

Garry S. Bahling
(technical)

Facts

On Dec. 14, 2003, at 10:23 a.m., plaintiff Sukhsagar Pannu, 47, was driving his 1998 Land Rover Discovery I in the number 2 westbound lane on the 118 freeway. He was wearing a seat belt. Bret Lusis, 16 years old and driving an Acura, struck Pannu's driver's side. After this collision, Pannu's car moved right and collided with another vehicle, and then went counter-clockwise, rolling over three and a half times. Pannu sued defendant Land Rover North America Inc., among others, claiming that the Discovery I had defective stability and handling characteristics as well as insufficient roof strength. Trial proceeded on strict liability design defect and failure to warn theories.

Contentions

DEFENDANTS' CONTENTIONS:
The defendants contended that the Discovery I was not defective and that it had rolled over because of a curb at the north edge of the 118 freeway. The defendant also claimed the roof strength was irrelevant as plaintiff dove to the roof and suffered injury before any significant roof deformation occurred. The defendants contended that Lusis was the sole cause of plaintiff's injuries and damages.

Injuries

Plaintiff was rendered a C6-7 partial quadriplegic.

Result

The judge issued a tentative decision on March 23, 2009, finding that the Discovery I was defectively designed and that defendants failed to warn of the vehicle's inadequate stability and roof strength. The judge awarded $11,654,000 in economic damages and $10 million in general damages, with 95 percent liability to Land Rover defendants and five percent to Bret Lusis.


#108665

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390