Cipro Cases I and II
Published: Jul. 27, 2013 | Result Date: Jul. 11, 2013 | Filing Date: Jan. 1, 1900 |Case number: 4154; 4220 Settlement – $74,000,000
Court
San Diego Superior
Attorneys
Plaintiff
Dan Drachler
(Zwerling, Schachter & Zwerling LLP)
Jordan Elias
(Girard Sharp LLP)
Joseph R. Saveri
(Joseph Saveri Law Firm Inc.)
Brendan P. Glackin
(Office of the Utah Attorney General)
Eric B. Fastiff
(Lieff Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein LLP)
Defendant
Christopher J. Healey
(Dentons US LLP)
Phillip A. Proger
(Jones Day)
Facts
Plaintiffs filed a class action against Bayer AG, stemming from the sale of the drug Ciprofloxacin. The plaintiffs claimed that Bayer paid $398.1 million to various laboratories in exchange for an agreement not to produce a generic version of Cipro or to pursue patent litigation against the Cipro patent. As a result, consumers were denied access to an affordable, generic version of Cipro.
Bayer was granted a patent for Cipro in 1987. After Barr Laboratories filed an application to market and sell a generic version, Bayer filed a patent infringement suit against Barr. Bayer and Barr eventually entered into a settlement agreement where Barr would abandon its challenges to the Cipro patent.
Result
The parties settled for $74 million with Bayer. The rest of the case continues against Barr and the other non-settling defendants.
For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:
Email
jeremy@reprintpros.com
for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390