This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Securities
Violations of Exchange Act
Artificial Revenue Inflation

Robert Curry v. Hansen Medical Inc., et al.

Published: Aug. 10, 2013 | Result Date: Jul. 25, 2013 | Filing Date: Jan. 1, 1900 |

Case number: 4:09-cv-5094 Settlement –  $8,500,000

Court

USDC Central


Attorneys

Plaintiff

Peter A. Binkow

Joshua L. Crowell
(Office of the Los Angeles City Attorney)

Michael M. Goldberg

Lionel Z. Glancy
(Glancy, Prongay & Murray LLP)

Robert V. Prongay
(Glancy, Prongay & Murray LLP)

Ex Kano S. Sams II
(Glancy, Prongay & Murray LLP)


Defendant

Charlene S. Shimada
(Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP)

Bruce G. Vanyo
(Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP )

John D. Pernick
(Bergeson LLP)

Christina L. Costley
(Katten, Muchin & Rosenman LLP)


Facts

A putative shareholder securities class action was filed against Hansen Medical Inc., a medical robotics maker, alleging that the company artificially inflated its revenues and misrepresented its financial condition and outlook in violation of the federal securities laws.

Contentions

PLAINTIFF'S CONTENTIONS:
Plaintiffs alleged that defendants violated the federal securities laws, including Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and Securities and Exchange Commission Rules 10b5-1(a),(b), and (c), by causing or allowing the Company to distribute to the market materially false and misleading information through public statements relating to the company's financial results and technique of recognizing revenue and by carrying out a common plan, scheme, and unlawful course of conduct.

DEFENDANT'S CONTENTIONS:
Defendants denied all charges of wrongdoing or liability against them arising out of any of the claims alleged.

Result

The parties reached a settlement for $8.5 million, which the district court preliminarily approved.


#108950

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390