This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Personal Injury
Dangerous Condition of Public Property
Wrongful Death

Sarkis Karaminasyan, Victoria Karaminasyan, a minor v. State of California, Department of Transportation, et. al.

Published: Mar. 5, 2016 | Result Date: Jan. 29, 2016 | Filing Date: Jan. 1, 1900 |

Case number: BC423548 Verdict –  Defense

Court

L.A. Superior Burbank


Attorneys

Plaintiff

Delores A. Yarnall

Sirak Bagdasaryan

Lars C. Johnson
(Signature Resolution)


Defendant

Janine R. Fowler
(Caltrans/Legal Division- Dept of Transportation)

Paul R. Brown


Experts

Plaintiff

Ronald Huston
(technical)

Thomas G. Schultz
(technical)

Peter Formuzis Ph.D.
(technical)

Defendant

Edward Nahabedian
(technical)

Stephanie R. Rizzardi-Pearson
(technical)

Facts

On Sept. 23, 2008, a vehicle driven by Marine Kechechyan, 20, was involved in a minor accident with another vehicle on the eastbound 134 freeway. Kechechyan's vehicle went off the roadway and over a 20-foot embankment, where it collided with a large tree. She was crushed by the tree and killed. Her vehicle continued down the embankment, colliding with a fence and then into a parked car in a parking lot. The other vehicle never stopped and the driver was never identified.

Plaintiffs are decedent's husband of five years, Sarkis Karaminasyan, and their nine-year-old daughter, who was two at the time of the accident.

Contentions

PLAINTIFF'S CONTENTIONS:
Plaintiffs alleged there was a dangerous condition of public property as there was an inadequate shoulder recovery area and there should have been a guardrail at the location, due to the steep embankment, which had numerous large trees. They claimed decedent would have sustained only minor injuries had decedent struck a guardrail. They claimed the state knew the area was dangerous as a guardrail project had been recommended the year before the accident and a temporary k-rail was placed at the location in 2010, while waiting for the guardrail project to commence.

DEFENDANT'S CONTENTIONS:
The state contended there was no dangerous condition of public property as its actions were reasonable. It also asserted a design immunity defense and claimed the drivers involved in the accident were negligent.

Settlement Discussions

Plaintiffs proposed a high/low of $7 million to $13 million during trial. Defendant offered $2.5 million prior to trial.

Specials in Evidence

Death caused by closed head injuries and severe trauma. 140,000 $500,000 -$4 million

Result

Defense verdict.

Other Information

Jurors indicated they had been deadlocked on the question of whether there was a dangerous condition of public property for over three days, prior to reaching a verdict. FILING DATE: Oct. 9, 2009.

Deliberation

three days

Poll

9-3 (dangerous condition of public property)

Length

20 days


#109008

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390