Sarkis Karaminasyan, Victoria Karaminasyan, a minor v. State of California, Department of Transportation, et. al.
Published: Mar. 5, 2016 | Result Date: Jan. 29, 2016 | Filing Date: Jan. 1, 1900 |Case number: BC423548 Verdict – Defense
Court
L.A. Superior Burbank
Attorneys
Plaintiff
Lars C. Johnson
(Signature Resolution)
Defendant
Janine R. Fowler
(Caltrans/Legal Division- Dept of Transportation)
Experts
Plaintiff
Ronald Huston
(technical)
Thomas G. Schultz
(technical)
Peter Formuzis Ph.D.
(technical)
Defendant
Edward Nahabedian
(technical)
Stephanie R. Rizzardi-Pearson
(technical)
Facts
On Sept. 23, 2008, a vehicle driven by Marine Kechechyan, 20, was involved in a minor accident with another vehicle on the eastbound 134 freeway. Kechechyan's vehicle went off the roadway and over a 20-foot embankment, where it collided with a large tree. She was crushed by the tree and killed. Her vehicle continued down the embankment, colliding with a fence and then into a parked car in a parking lot. The other vehicle never stopped and the driver was never identified.
Plaintiffs are decedent's husband of five years, Sarkis Karaminasyan, and their nine-year-old daughter, who was two at the time of the accident.
Contentions
PLAINTIFF'S CONTENTIONS:
Plaintiffs alleged there was a dangerous condition of public property as there was an inadequate shoulder recovery area and there should have been a guardrail at the location, due to the steep embankment, which had numerous large trees. They claimed decedent would have sustained only minor injuries had decedent struck a guardrail. They claimed the state knew the area was dangerous as a guardrail project had been recommended the year before the accident and a temporary k-rail was placed at the location in 2010, while waiting for the guardrail project to commence.
DEFENDANT'S CONTENTIONS:
The state contended there was no dangerous condition of public property as its actions were reasonable. It also asserted a design immunity defense and claimed the drivers involved in the accident were negligent.
Settlement Discussions
Plaintiffs proposed a high/low of $7 million to $13 million during trial. Defendant offered $2.5 million prior to trial.
Specials in Evidence
Death caused by closed head injuries and severe trauma. 140,000 $500,000 -$4 million
Result
Defense verdict.
Other Information
Jurors indicated they had been deadlocked on the question of whether there was a dangerous condition of public property for over three days, prior to reaching a verdict. FILING DATE: Oct. 9, 2009.
Deliberation
three days
Poll
9-3 (dangerous condition of public property)
Length
20 days
For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:
Email
jeremy@reprintpros.com
for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390