This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Personal Injury (Non-Vehicular)
Premises Liability
Trip and Fall

Pete Macen v. KBG Co., et al

Published: Sep. 28, 1996 | Result Date: Feb. 28, 1996 | Filing Date: Jan. 1, 1900 |

Case number: GC012333 –  $110,000

Judge

Gabriel A. Gutierrez

Gabriel A. Gutierrez

Court

L.A. Superior Pasadena


Attorneys

Plaintiff

Werner R. Meissner
(Meissner Law Firm PC)

Werner R. Meissner
(Meissner Law Firm PC)


Defendant

Bradley M. Bush

Bradley M. Bush


Experts

Plaintiff

Dan Shepman
(technical)

Robert H. Ghatan
(medical)

Carl Sheriff
(technical)

Dan Shepman
(technical)

Robert H. Ghatan
(medical)

Carl Sheriff
(technical)

Defendant

Louis R. Vasquez
(medical)

Louis R. Vasquez
(medical)

Michael Von Haenel
(technical)

Facts

On May 8, 1993, plaintiff Pete Macen, a 46-year-old man on disability for diabetes, returned to his home at approximately 11 p.m. After parking in the carport, the plaintiff was walking around the front of his apartment complex and got his foot caught on a sprinkler head. Although the sprinkler was level with the adjacent sidewalk, the plaintiff claimed it was essentially "protruding" from the ground due to a allegedly bowl 3 to 4 inches deep that had been created around the sprinkler head presumably from continous cutting with a weedwacker and other improper landscaping techniques. The defendants claimed the bowl, if any, was only 1"deep. The plaintiff brought this action against KBG Co., the owners and landlord management company, and the managers, based on premises liability and negligence theories of recovery.

Settlement Discussions

The plaintiff made an initial C.C.P. º998 settlement demand for $75,000 and later made a reduced C.C.P. º998 demand of $25,000 and then a written offer of $20,000 prior to trial. The defendants made an initial settlement offer of $5,000 at the first MSC, which was reduced to a waiver of costs in writing prior to trial.

Specials in Evidence

$25,000 $5,000

Injuries

The plaintiff alleged he sustained a fractured left hip requiring open reduction and internal fixation surgery, post operative physical therapy.

Other Information

The verdict was reached approximately one year and ten months after the case was filed. An arbitration was held on March 27, 1995 before Charles O'Reilly resulting in an award of $71,589. The defendants requested a trial de novo. The first trial (the arbitration??) ended in a mistrial which the defendants claimed was caused by the plaintiff.

Deliberation

3 hours

Poll

11-1

Length

6 days


#109646

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390