This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Personal Injury (Non-Vehicular)
Medical Malpractice
Negligent Care

The Estate of Diane Esman by and through its Executors, et al. v. Anne Murray, M.D. et al.

Published: Oct. 12, 1996 | Result Date: Aug. 20, 1996 | Filing Date: Jan. 1, 1900 |

Case number: SC012888 –  $0

Facts

On Aug. 8, 1992, decedent Diane Esman, a 43-year-old housewife, presented to defendant St. John's Hospital for radical cancer surgery. The plaintiffs contended that the defendant anesthesiologist, Anne Murray, M.D., failed to monitor the post-operative management of Demerol which was administered through patient-controlled analgesia, following cancer surgery. The plaintiffs also contended that Dr. Murray over-prescribed the Demerol, abandoned the decedent and failed to monitor the decedent resulting in severe agitation, hallucinations and seizures. The plaintiffs contended that they incurred severe emotional distress as a result of watching the over-administration of Demerol and a subsequent cardiac arrest. Defendant Dr. Murray contended that her order for PCA Demerol was appropriate, given the decedent's tolerance for pain medication and high "therapeutic window." The defendant doctor further contended that the post-operative management of the decedent's PCA Demerol was the responsibility of the plaintiff's surgeon and the oncological surgical team. The plaintiffs, the decedent's heirs, brought this action against the defendants, the anesthesiologist, the nurse and the hospital, based on medical malpractice and negligence theories of recovery.

Settlement Discussions

The plaintiffs made a settlement demand for $250,000. The defendants made no initial settlement offer.

Injuries

The plaintiffs alleged they sustained emotional distress.

Other Information

The verdict was reached approximately four years and nine months after the case was filed. The plaintiffs originally brought a cause of action for wrongful death. This was summarily adjudicated because the plaintiff had been diagnosed with terminal cancer at the time of her care and treatment with Dr. Murray. The plaintiffs settled with the defendant hospital and the defendant nurse on the first day of trial for a confidential amount.

Deliberation

6 hours

Poll

11-1

Length

11 days


#109738

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390