This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

CONFIDENTIAL

Nov. 15, 2001

Real Property
Inverse Condemnation
Dangerous Condition of Public Property

Confidential

Settlement –  $566,176

Judge

William F. McDonald

Court

Orange Superior


Attorneys

Plaintiff

Jacqueline Axtell

Wesley L. Davis

Steven A. Blum


Defendant

Edwin J. Richards Jr.
(Kutak Rock LLP)

Daniel R. Sullivan
(Sullivan Ballog & Williams LLP)


Experts

Plaintiff

Dennis A. Evans
(technical)

Defendant

Marc Delattre
(technical)

Theodore V. Hromadka II
(technical)

Facts

The plaintiff homeowners were next-door neighbors on Palo Alto Street in a subdivision in the City of Dana
Point. They contended that a 40-year-old city-owned corrugated metal storm drain traversing plaintiffÆs
property leaked, contributing to the failure of the hillside behind their homes in February and March 1998.
The plaintiffs also maintained that a city road cut made in the early 1960Æs at the bottom of the slope
destabilized the slope and contributed to the failure. The plaintiffs alleged that the failure was a deep-seated
landslide. The plaintiffsÆ expert, Dennis Evans, a geologist and geotechnical engineer, testified that the storm
drain and road cuts were substantial contributing causes to a deep-seated failure of the slope behind the
plaintiffsÆ homes.
Defendants City of Dana Point and Orange County contended that the hill failed because
of natural groundwater conditions and the 1998 El Nino rainstorms. The defendant cityÆs experts,
geologist Marc Delattre and hydrologist Theodore Hromadka, Ph.D., testified that the cause of
damage was a high groundwater level and the El Nino rains of 1998.

Result

The court found in favor of the plaintiffs and against the city in the first part of the bifurcated trial. The issue was whether the city had inversely condemned two homeownersÆ hillside properties by making road cuts that destabilized the hillside or by maintaining a leaky storm drain in an easement through one of the homeownerÆs property. The court found that there was such an inverse condemnation and a nuisance, as well as a dangerous condition of public property. Before the second part of the trial on damages, the case settled for a total of $566,176. The city agreed to pay $536,176 and the county, which had reached a settlement prior to the first part of the trial - agreed to pay $30,000. The city also agreed to repair the hillside immediately to a 1.5 factor of safety and repair any consequential damages.


#110140

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390