This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

CONFIDENTIAL

Dec. 6, 2001

Personal Injury (Vehicular)
Auto v. Pedestrian
Negligence

Confidential

Settlement –  $1,200,000

Judge

Susan Bryant-Deason

Court

L.A. Superior Central


Attorneys

Plaintiff

Carlo Noravian


Defendant

Scott J. Vida

Dean A. Olson
(Clark Hill LLP)

Victor A. Schulte


Experts

Plaintiff

Lawrence Miller M.D.
(medical)

Jan Roughan R.N.
(medical)

Lewis Collin Moore
(technical)

Charles Aronberg
(medical)

Stanley Goodman
(medical)

Darryl R. Zengler M.A.
(technical)

Jacob E. Tauber M.D.
(medical)

Facts

On Oct. 26, 1999, the plaintiff, a 65-year-old woman and her husband, were crossing an
uncontrolled intersection within a crosswalk in Los Angeles. The time was 6:15 a.m. and the light
conditions were dark. While driving to work, the defendant struck the plaintiff and carried her on
top of her vehicle for 25-to-30 feet prior to braking. The plaintiffÆs husband witnessed the
incident. The plaintiff was hospitalized for 40 days and resided in a convalescent center for six
months.

Settlement Discussions

The defendant's insurance carrier made a $15,000 offer prior to litigation. Later at a mediation, the carrier offered $350,000 to settle. At the last mediation, the case settled for $1.2 million.

Specials in Evidence

$305,000 Disputed

Injuries

The plaintiffÆs injuries included broken legs, blunt head trauma and a severely damaged left optic nerve. The extent of neurological damage was in dispute.

Result

The City of Los Angeles was dismissed for a waiver of costs. The defendantÆs policy limits were $15,000/$30,000, but her insurance carrier paid $1,185,000 above the policy to limit their exposure for not having settled the claim prior to the expiration of a policy limits demand.

Other Information

The case was settled at second mediation before William Sheffield. The issue was whether the insurance carrier obligated itself to pay extra contractual damages by failing to timely tender the defendantÆs $15,000 policy limit to settle. The policy was not paid in part, because the plaintiffÆs attorney did not provide medical records to substantiate the injuries, arguing there was no duty to do so. The insurance carrier contended that without the medical records, it was unable to properly evaluate the claim. The $1.2 million settlement consisted of $15,000 from the insurance policy and $1,185,000 in extra contractual damages to avoid an excess judgment against the defendant.


#110197

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390