This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Personal Injury
Medical Malpractice
Chiropractor Negligence

Suzanne Hogsett, Gerald Hogsett v. Richard Petersen, Vikki Petersen, Healthnow Medical Center

Published: Aug. 5, 2003 | Result Date: Apr. 23, 2003 | Filing Date: Jan. 1, 1900 |

Case number: CV802676 Verdict –  $0

Judge

Jamie A. Jacobs-May

Court

Santa Clara Superior


Attorneys

Plaintiff

David S. Rosenberg


Defendant

Elisabeth A. Madden
(Law Offices of Madden & Lynch PC)


Experts

Plaintiff

Raila Horne
(medical)

Roy Mawhinney
(medical)

Mark E. Abramson
(medical)

Alan Galitz
(medical)

Robert Cooperstein
(medical)

Defendant

Darryl D. Curl
(medical)

David M. Bradshaw
(medical)

Everett P. Harry
(technical)

Jennifer L. Martin
(medical)

James R. Missett
(medical)

Paul S.D. Berg
(medical)

Facts

The plaintiff, a 52-year-old female travel author, claimed that she was persuaded to present to the defendants' chiropractic clinic in order to receive counseling on nutrition. The plaintiff claimed she received additional examinations which involved x-rays and other procedures which were undertaken without her consent. The plaintiff claimed that defendant Richard Petersen pulled on her leg violently, without warning, and as a consequence, she sustained a cervical whiplash and her jaw impacted the side of the chiropractic table. The defendants asserted that they had never concealed that they offered chiropractic services and that the plaintiff had, in fact, requested treatment for her lower leg pains. Following examinations and an x-ray, the defendant chiropractor claimed that he properly and conservatively performed adjustments on the plaintiff's bilateral talus and calcaneus, and that she neither objected or mentioned any discomfort.

Settlement Discussions

The plaintiff demanded $500,000; the defendant offered a waiver of costs.

Specials in Evidence

$5,000 $300,000

Damages

The plaintiff sought general damages of $250,000 and her husband claimed loss of consortium.

Injuries

The plaintiff claimed that she suffered from myofascial pain syndrome, TMJ disorder caused by the impact to her jaw, injuries to her seventh and eighth cranial nerves which resulted in a partial right-side hearing loss, and post-traumatic stress disorder. The defense claimed that the plaintiff had a pre-existing recent history of neck and jaw myositis and fibromyalgia. The defense stated that the plaintiff's TMJ disorder did not arise until more than three months after the chiropractic adjustment and was probably caused by a history of jaw clenching and her somatic complaints were of a psychological origin.

Other Information

The plaintiffs' motion for new trial was denied.

Deliberation

four hours

Length

16 days


#110247

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390