This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Torts
Government Liability
Nursing Home Negligence

Jeffrey R. Golin, Elsie Y. Golin and Nancy K. Golin v. Clifford B. Allenby, Former Director, Dept. of Developmental Disabilities, State of California, Director Dept. of Social Services, in his Personal and Official Capacities, et al.

Published: Nov. 14, 2015 | Result Date: May 8, 2015 | Filing Date: Jan. 1, 1900 |

Case number: CIV507159 Verdict –  Defense

Court

San Mateo Superior


Attorneys

Plaintiff

David J. Beauvais

Kathleen E. Wells
(Kathleen E Wells Attorney at Law)

Walter K. Pyle

Frances S. Kaminer


Defendant

Michael A. King
(Office of the Sonoma County Counsel)

Peter F. Finn
(Bradley, Curley, Barrabee & Kowalski)

Mark F. Bernal
(Office of the Santa Clara County Counsel)

Angele K. Cicala

David Sheuerman

Reuben B. Jacobson
(Lewis, Brisbois, Bisgaard & Smith LLP)


Experts

Defendant

Julie Baird
(medical)

Facts

Nancy Golin, 43, was a developmentally disabled woman unable to speak. On Nov. 14, 2001, Nancy wandered away from her parents and was missing for over 12 hours. Nancy was removed from her parents' care and the California Department of Developmental Services appointed as her conservator.

Nancy and her parents, Jeffrey and Elsie Golin, sued various individuals and governmental agencies related to the incident.

Contentions

PLAINTIFFS' CONTENTIONS:
The Golins contended that Nancy was unlawfully removed from her parents, falsely imprisoned, unlawfully detained, and abused. They also contended that Nancy sustained injuries to her collarbone while being held at Embee Manor as the result of negligent care and supervision. The plaintiffs also claimed violation of various civil rights.

Plaintiffs brought claims for violation of the right to familial association under 42 U.S.C. Section 1983 and dependent adult abuse under the Elder Abuse and Dependent Adult Civil Protection Act.

DEFENDANTS' CONTENTIONS:
Defendants contended that they acted appropriately. They claimed that Nancy was taken to the hospital under a 5150 hold only after her parents were uncooperative following her return. They further contended that Nancy's parents were suspected of abuse and neglect, which led, in part, to Nancy's continued hold.

Settlement Discussions

The demand to Stanford was $7 million. Stanford made no offer.

Injuries

The Golins claimed that Nancy suffered a clavicle fracture and emotional distress.

Result

The jury returned a defense verdict.

Other Information

FILING DATE: July 21, 2011.

Length

24 days


#110717

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390