Zimbalist v. Doe Hospital
Published: Oct. 29, 2011 | Result Date: Oct. 6, 2011 | Filing Date: Jan. 1, 1900 |Case number: SC102873 Verdict – Defense
Court
L.A. Superior Santa Monica
Attorneys
Plaintiff
Jeffrey A. Milman
(Hodes Milman Ikuta LLP)
Thomas E. Rockett
(Law Offices of Thomas E. Rockett III)
Defendant
Experts
Plaintiff
Laura Mahlmeister
(medical)
Elizabeth Holakiewicz RN
(medical)
Arthur S. Shorr
(technical)
Catherine M. Graves MBA
(technical)
Michael I. Katz
(Maschoff Brennan)
(medical)
Wallace Peck
(medical)
George S. Romansky
(medical)
Defendant
Juan C. Felix
(medical)
Anne Taylor
(medical)
David J. Weiner M.B.A., AM
(technical)
Kimberly Bedell M.D.
(medical)
Facts
Mrs. Zimbalist, age 34, was admitted to the hospital in the late evening on Feb. 8, 2009. Nurse A admitted her to Labor and Delivery, reviewed the fetal heart rate strip, and reported telephonically to the obstetrician on call for the patient's medical group. Nurse B took over the care at 3 a.m. and spoke to the obstetrician at about 3:30 a.m. The obstetrician ordered preparation for c-section. The incision was not until 4:39 a.m. The baby was born severely depressed, resuscitated and transferred to the NICU.
Contentions
PLAINTIFF'S CONTENTIONS:
Plaintiff claimed that there was progressively worsening fetal distress caused by a worsening placental abruption. The delay in the c-section was due to nursing and hospital negligence in not summoning a back-up anesthesiologist, as the anesthesiologist assigned to Labor and Delivery was doing another c-section. The baby would have been normal if born 30 to 45 minutes sooner.
Plaintiff also claimed that the hospital violated the "30-minute rule" (decision to incision). The obstetrician, before she resolved her portion of the case, gave a deposition where she was highly critical of the nurses. At trial, she was, again, very critical of the nurses.
DEFENDANT'S CONTENTIONS:
Defense claimed that the obstetrician arrived at 3:46 a.m. and chose to wait for her partner to show up to do the c-section. Defense further claimed that the nursing care was not negligent and did not cause a delayed delivery; and that the placental abruption occurred before the mother was admitted to the hospital.
Settlement Discussions
Before trial, plaintiff made a CCP 998 demand for $6 million. Defendant made a CCP 998 offer for $1 million. During trial, plaintiff demanded $1.9 million. Defendant offered $1.5 million. During jury deliberations, plaintiff demanded $3.5 million. Defendant offered $1.7 million.
Specials in Evidence
$180,000 (out of pocket) $1.2 million (defense) to $1.7 million (plaintiff) $4.5 million to $12 million, depending on the minor's life expectancy (plaintiffs' expert opined 50 to 60 years; defense expert opined 20 to 25 years)
Damages
Three non-economic $250,000 MICRA caps.
Injuries
The minor suffered hypoxic encephalopathy, quadriplegia and hypotonia allegedly due to prolonged fetal distress.
Result
Defense verdict.
Other Information
Plaintiffs' nursing expert provided a long list of criticisms of the nurses. Plaintiffs' hospital administration expert was permitted to testify over the objections of the hospital, as he had no training or licensure as a nurse or a medical doctor. "Obamacare" was ruled inadmissible by the trial judge as speculative due to constitutional challenge. FILING DATE: April 30, 2009.
Deliberation
three days
Poll
10-2
Length
five weeks
For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:
Email
jeremy@reprintpros.com
for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390