This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Personal Injury
Medical Malpractice
Lack of Informed Consent

Adeline Taylor v. Larry D. Scortt, D.P.M.

Published: Oct. 10, 1998 | Result Date: Aug. 4, 1998 | Filing Date: Jan. 1, 1900 |

Case number: 5639174 Verdict –  $0

Judge

Stephen R. Henry

Court

Fresno Superior


Attorneys

Plaintiff

Andrew B. Jones
(Wagner, Jones, Kopfman & Artenian LLP)


Defendant

Michael F. Ball
(McCormick, Barstow, Sheppard, Wayte & Carruth LLP)


Experts

Plaintiff

James S. Nabwangu
(medical)

Defendant

Joshua Gerbert
(medical)

Facts

On Nov. 15, 1994, plaintiff Adeline Taylor, a 51-year-old hairdresser, had surgery performed on both of her feet by defendant Dr. Larry Scortt. The pre-operative diagnosis was bunions, "Tailor's bunions," hammer toes, and corns. Unhappy with the results, she had three subsequent surgeries, two on her right foot and one on her left foot, with podiatric surgeon James C. Wang in Santa Monica, all at the Santa Monica - UCLA Medical Center. The plaintiff brought this action against the defendant based on medical malpractice and negligence theories of recovery.

Settlement Discussions

There were no settlement discussions. The defendant did not give consent to settle to his insurance carrier.

Specials in Evidence

$40,000 "six figures" $20,000

Injuries

The plaintiff suffered an elevatus of the first, fourth and fifth toes bilaterally, a metatarsophalangeal joint stress syndrome, a nerve entrapment of the right first interspace, and weakened and non-functioning lesser toes. Further surgery was suggested, including a possible fusion of the right first metatarsophalangeal joint with bone graft. The plaintiff claimed she was disabled from her occupation as a hairdresser.

Other Information

The verdict was reached approximately two years and three months after the case was filed. The defendant was unsuccessful on a statute of limitations affirmative defense after a one-day court trial (immediately preceding the 7+-day jury trial).

Deliberation

one hour

Poll

11-1

Length

7½ days


#112480

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390