This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Intellectual Property
Copyright Infringement
Lanham Act

Don Henley, Mike Campbell, Danny Korthmar v. Charles S. Devore, Justin Hart

Published: Aug. 14, 2010 | Result Date: Jun. 10, 2010 | Filing Date: Jan. 1, 1900 |

Case number: 8:09-cv-00481-JVS-RNB Bench Decision –  Plaintiffs

Court

USDC Central


Attorneys

Plaintiff

Tania Magoon

Cindy Abramson

Jacqueline Charlesworth

Paul Goldstein

Craig B. Whitney
(Frankurt, Kurnit, Klein & Selz, PC)

Charles S. Barquist
(Morrison & Foerster LLP)


Defendant

Peter R. Afrasiabi
(One LLP)

John Tehranian
(One LLP)

Chris Arledge
(Ellis George Cipollone LLP)


Facts

Defendants Chuck DeVore and Justin Hart made videos using musician, Don Henley's, songs to promote DeVore's campaign for U.S. Senate. The campaign ads were posted on various websites, including YouTube.

Don Henley, Mike Campbell, and Danny Kortchmar filed suit against DeVore and Hart, alleging copyright infringement. Henley also brought a claim against the defendants for false endorsement under the Lanham Act.

Contentions

PLAINTIFF'S CONTENTIONS:
Henley alleged he did not authorize the use of his work and did not wish it to be associated with DeVore or his campaign.

DEFENDANTS' CONTENTIONS:
DeVore and Hart contended that their use of the songs were parodies, protected by the fair-use doctrines of the U.S. Copyright Act. DeVore alleged that rewriting the lyrics to the songs to attack liberal policies clearly displayed the intention to parody the songs.

Result

The court rejected defendants' fair-use defense, finding that the campaign ads were infringing, but granted summary judgment to the defense on the Lanham Act claim. The parties subsequently a confidential settlement as to damages.

Other Information

FILING DATE: April 17, 2009.


#112789

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390