This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Attorneys
Legal Malpractice
Attorneys Fees

William Horrigan and Barbara Horrigan v. Kindel & Anderson; Carol A. Pfaffmann and Gary W. Maeder

Published: Dec. 13, 1997 | Result Date: Nov. 21, 1997 | Filing Date: Jan. 1, 1900 |

Case number: BC104414 –  $1,625,000

Judge

Harvey A. Schneider

Court

L.A. Superior Central


Attorneys

Plaintiff

Leonard S. Steiner
(Steiner & Libo)


Defendant

Bruce A. Armstrong


Experts

Plaintiff

Greg Robson
(technical)

Michael L. Wolfe
(technical)

Defendant

Bernard Schearer
(technical)

David Harrison
(technical)

William J. Michiels
(technical)

Facts

Plaintiffs William and Barbara Horrigan,72 and 58 years of age, respectively, owned 85 percent of an insurance agency. In the summer of 1991, they retained defendants Kindel & Anderson, Gary Maeder and Carol A. Pfaffmann, to represent them in the sale of their insurance agency. The closing occurred on Nov. 11, 1991. The sale price was a sliding scale of between $2 million and $4 million, depending on the profitability of the agency after the acquisition. The buyer defaulted and defendants received nothing for their agency. The plaintiff brought this action against defendants based on two causes of action, one for legal malpractice and one to recover overcharges of legal fees.

Settlement Discussions

The plaintiffs made a C.C.P. º998 settlement demand for $1.5 million. The defendants made no offers.

Damages

The plaintiffs claimed $2 million in damages for the loss of the value of their insurance agency. Defendants' valuation expert, William Michiels, testified that plaintiffs' agency was worth nothing as of the closing. The plaintiffs claimed the overcharge was $45,000.

Result

On the legal malpractice cause of action, the jury awarded plaintiffs $2 million but found plaintiffs to be 20 percent comparatively negligent, for a net award of $1.6 million. On the cause of action to recover overcharges of fees, the jury awarded plaintiffs $25,000.

Other Information

The verdict was reached approximately three years and six months after the case was filed. Defendants will be filing a motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict.

Deliberation

three days

Poll

varied between 10-2 and 12-0

Length

13 days


#113016

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390