This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Environmental Law
CEQA
Writ of Mandamus

Aaron Montenegro, Residents and Families for El Monte v. City of El Monte, City Council of El Monte, and Does 1 through 4

Published: Feb. 25, 2017 | Result Date: Jan. 6, 2017 | Filing Date: Jan. 1, 1900 |

Case number: BS158641 Bench Decision –  Writ Granted

Court

L.A. Superior Central


Attorneys

Plaintiff

Gideon Kracov
(ADR Services, Inc.)


Defendant

Lloyd Pilchen
(Olivarez Madruga LLP)

David F. Gondek
(Olivarez Madruga LLP)


Facts

On Nov. 6, 2015, petitioner City of El Monte residents filed suit against the City of El Monte and Walmart, in relation to plans for a new Walmart Supercenter. In October 2015, defendant City of El Monte approved the environmental impact report and land use approvals to construct a new 182,429 square foot Walmart supercenter.

Contentions

PLAINTIFF'S CONTENTIONS:
Plaintiff claimed that the project environmental impact report lacked substantial evidence, violated the California Environmental Quality Act, and therefore that the EIR and the land use approvals must be voided. Specifically, petitioners alleged the EIR and land use approvals for the Walmart failed to adequately assess the significance of, and mitigate, the greenhouse gas emissions from the project's almost 9,500 peak daily car trips causing 7,575 metric tons per year in greenhouse gas emissions and other smog-related air pollution.

DEFENDANT'S CONTENTIONS:
The city and Walmart argued that the EIR had in fact properly assessed the significance of the project's greenhouse gas emissions, and that petitioners had not adequately exhausted administrative remedies before filing suit.

Result

The court rejected the city and Walmart's arguments, granted the writ of mandate and issued judgment against the city requiring it to set aside the EIR and land use approvals for the Walmart as to the greenhouse gas issue. The court found the city's analysis in the EIR violated CEQA's rules for greenhouse gas analysis set forth in the California Supreme Court's opinion in Center for Biological Diversity v. California Dept. of Fish and Wildlife (Newhall Ranch), (2015) 62 Cal.4th 204. Like Newhall Ranch, the court determined that the Walmart EIR contained an analytical gap since the city prejudicially failed to provide a reasoned explanation as to whether the greenhouse gas emissions were significant. The court enjoined any construction of the Walmart project until a new EIR is prepared to address the project's greenhouse gas impacts.

Other Information

FILING DATE: Nov. 6, 2015.


#113296

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390