This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Breach of Contract
Architectural Agreement
Value of Services Rendered

William Howell, William Howell & Associates Architect v. Compton Unified School District

Published: Sep. 7, 1996 | Result Date: Jun. 11, 1996 | Filing Date: Jan. 1, 1900 |

Case number: BC113856 –  $417,833

Judge

Edward M. Ross

Court

L.A. Superior Central


Attorneys

Plaintiff

Laurence M. Scharnberger


Defendant

Melanie E. Lomax


Experts

Plaintiff

James Scilott
(technical)

Defendant

Michelle Pettit
(technical)

Facts

The plaintiffs, William Howell and William Howell & Associates Architect (collectively referred to as "Howell"), had been the "architect of record" for Defendant Compton Unified School District since 1983. Howell was retained by written contract to provide architectural services for the modernization of 26 of defendant Compton Unified School District's schools. The projects were broken into two phases of 10 and 16 schools respectively. Howell prepared plans and specifications, obtained approvals from the Office of the State Architect on the 10-school project and was in the beginning stages of obtaining approvals for the 16-school project, when the defendants refused to make any further payments for services rendered. The plaintiffs brought this action against the defendant based on breach of contract and value of services rendered theories of recovery.

Settlement Discussions

The plaintiffs made a C.C.P. º998 settlement demand for $340,000. The defendant made no settlement offers.

Damages

The plaintiffs claimed they were owed $76,000 outstanding for work on the 10 schools and $106,012 on the 16 schools. They also sought damages as a result of the defendant's breach for the work that was prevented by the defendant in the sum of $1,024,617 on the 16 schools and $363,547 on the 10 schools.

Other Information

The verdict was reached approximately one year and eight months after the case was filed.

Deliberation

5 days

Poll

10-2

Length

2 weeks


#113902

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390