Anthony Dintcho v. Board of Podiatric Medicine
Published: Oct. 11, 2001 | Result Date: Jul. 25, 2001 | Filing Date: Jan. 1, 1900 |Case number: 01AS03759 Bench Decision – $0
Judge
Court
Sacramento Superior
Attorneys
Plaintiff
Matthew D. Rifat
(Law Offices of Matthew D. Rifat)
Defendant
Lawrence A. Mercer
(Office of the Attorney General)
Facts
The plaintiff filed a complaint alleging that the Board of Podiatric Medicine required limited
licenses of podiatric residents who were participating in board-approved hospital and clinic
residencies after the expiration of the statutory authority for such licenses. The board
acknowledged that the fees were imposed and the licenses were issued without statutory
authority. After filing of the complaint, the court entered a preliminary injunction. The board
claimed to have fully complied with the terms of the preliminary injunction and had indicated
willingness to have a permanent injunction entered. The matter has not yet been set for trial.
For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:
Email
jeremy@reprintpros.com
for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390