This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Contracts
Breach of Contract
Negligence

Capital Salvage, Bar-K v. Chicago Title Company

Published: Aug. 5, 2003 | Result Date: Apr. 11, 2003 | Filing Date: Jan. 1, 1900 |

Case number: BC270235 Bench Decision –  $0

Judge

Ronald M. Sohigian

Court

L.A. Superior Central


Attorneys

Plaintiff

Jerry K. Staub


Defendant

Robert L. Wallan
(Pillsbury, Winthrop, Shaw & Pittman LLP)

Christine A. Scheuneman


Experts

Plaintiff

Terry S. Kaplan
(technical)

Defendant

Collyer Church
(technical)

Alan Wayte
(technical)

Facts

The plaintiffs sued the defendant title company for breach of contract and escrow negligence. The plaintiffs had structured a real estate loan transaction in which Bar-K loaned money to a limited liability company (LLC) to acquire a commercial building subject to a simultaneous deed from the LLC to the plaintiff Capital Salvage. The LLC defaulted, leading to underlying litigation concerning the structure and authority of LLC to enter into the real estate transaction and the rights to the property. The underlying real estate litigation resulted in a settlement with the plaintiffs obtaining the property which they then sold at a substantial profit. As a part of an underlying settlement, the defendant made a contribution and received a release of all breach of contract claims against it, although an escrow negligence claim was preserved. Following the underlying settlement, the plaintiffs sued on both the released contract claim and in a theory of escrow negligence.

Settlement Discussions

The plaintiffs demanded $1.3 million at a mandatory settlement conference. The defendant offered $10,000.

Damages

The plaintiffs claimed damages of $1.5 million.

Other Information

The court awarded the defendant $375,000 in attorneys' fees on the defendant's post-trial motion.


#114251

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390