This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Civil Rights
Retaliation
FEHA, Gender and Sexual Discrimination

Lorri Sulpizio, Cathy Bass v. San Diego Mesa College, San Diego Community College District, Dave Evans, individually and Does 1 through 25

Published: Feb. 13, 2010 | Result Date: Dec. 4, 2009 | Filing Date: Jan. 1, 1900 |

Case number: 37-2008-00088329-CU-CR-CTL Verdict –  $28,000

Court

San Diego Superior


Attorneys

Plaintiff

Amy Todd-Gher
(Littler Mendelson PC)

Mattheus E. Stephens
(Littler Mendelson P.C.)

Darci E. Burrell
(Burrell Kagin Law LLP)

Leslie F. Levy

Shannon Minter
(National Center for Lesbian Rights)


Defendant

Ray Artiano

Lesa Wilson


Facts

In March 2006, plaintiff Lorri Sulpizio, then head coach of women's basketball at San Diego Mesa College (Mesa), began complaining to defendant Dave Evans, Mesa's Athletic Director, about inequitable athletic facilities for women at the school. Sulpizio continued to question Mesa's practices and policies that disadvantaged female student-athletes and female faculty throughout the 2006-2007 season. In 2007, Sulpizio filed a complaint alleging gender inequity, leading to an investigation by the federal Office of Civil Rights.

According to plaintiff's counsel: Sulpizio and plaintiff Cathy Bass, Sulpizio's domestic partner and the team's Director of Basketball Operations, were discharged by Mesa at the end of the 2007 academic year. In June 2007, Sulpizio was offered her job back with a performance plan. Sulpizio rejected the offer for a number of reasons including that the performance plan was unwarranted.

According to defense counsel: Sulpizio was not terminated nor was a performance plan put in place.

Sulpizio and Bass sued Mesa and the San Diego Community College District (District) in July 2008, alleging employment discrimination and retaliation. Bass settled her suit prior to trial.

Contentions

PLAINTIFF'S CONTENTIONS:
Sulpizio contended that her termination was in retaliation for her complaints of gender discrimination and violations of Title IX.

Settlement Discussions

On October 8, 2009, a few weeks prior to trial, Mesa made a statutory offer of $35,000, inclusive of all attorney fees and costs accrued to date.

Result

The jury awarded Sulpizio $28,000, equivalent to one year's salary, finding that the District's adverse employment actions were based on retaliation for Sulpizio's Title IX and gender inequity complaints. However, the jury did not find that she was discriminated against on the basis of her gender or sexual orientation. The jury did not award non-economic damages. The defense intends to file a motion notwithstanding the verdict.

Other Information

FILING DATE: July 24, 2008.


#114600

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390