This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Real Property
Easement
Extinguishment

Laguna Terrace Park, LLC v. Paul R. Esslinger, as Successor in Interest to Paul H. Esslinger and Marie M. Esslinger, Trustees and Joint Tenants of the Paul H. Esslinger and Marie M. Esslinger Trust Created Pursuant to Trust Agreement Made Effective Jan. 2, 1961, et al.

Published: Sep. 10, 2011 | Result Date: Mar. 9, 2011 | Filing Date: Jan. 1, 1900 |

Case number: 05CC02237 Bench Decision –  Defense

Court

Orange Superior


Attorneys

Plaintiff

Robert S. Coldren

John H. Pentecost


Defendant

Christine A. Scheuneman

Stephen A. Ellis

Gerard M. Mooney Jr.
(Rutan & Tucker LLP)


Facts

The Esslinger Intervivos Trust dated Oct. 11, 1984, of which Paul R. Esslinger was the trustee, owned land on Pacific Coast Highway in South Laguna Beach. The Esslinger Trust leased the land to Ruby's Diner, and Ruby's Diner operated a restaurant on the land. Laguna Terrace Park - owned by Paul's son, Stephen W. Esslinger - owned the parcel adjacent to Ruby's Diner, on which land Laguna Terrace Park operated a mobile home complex. Laguna Terrace Park's Land was burdened with an easement recorded in 1966 for ingress, egress, road and parking purposes for the benefit of The Esslinger Trust's property.

In 2005, Laguna Terrace Park filed suit against Paul as trustee to extinguish the easement. Although Laguna Terrace Park did not initially name Ruby's as a defendant in the action, the Court sustained The Esslinger Trust's defense of falure to name an indispensible party, and ordered Laguna Terrace Park to join Ruby's as a defendant.

Contentions

PLAINTIFF'S CONTENTIONS:
Laguna Terrace Park sought to extinguish the 1966 easement on the grounds of a purported "unity" or "merger" of title or interest, or, alternatively, pursuant to a claimed "overburdening." Laguna Terrace Park also argued that Paul's and Ruby's invitees were using the easement in a manner that created a dangerous condition. Laguna Terrace Park further requested that if the easement was not extinguished, it should be "reconfigured" by the Court.

Result

The court granted judgment in favor of Paul and Ruby's against Laguna Terrace Park, and awarded Paul and Ruby's their costs against Laguna Terrace Park.


#114678

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390