Margaret Gore v. Johann T. Hunter, R.W. Jacks Trucking Inc.
Published: May 20, 2006 | Result Date: Nov. 16, 2005 | Filing Date: Jan. 1, 1900 |Case number: SCV0016560 Verdict – $30,300
Judge
Court
Placer Superior
Attorneys
Plaintiff
Glenn S. Guenard
(Guenard & Bozarth LLP)
Defendant
Stephen J. Mackey
(Donahue Davies LLP)
Experts
Plaintiff
Paul Kisiliwicz
(medical)
James Willis
(medical)
Steven H. Kaufmann
(medical)
Robert Mistretta
(technical)
Charles McCrory
(medical)
Gary D. Nibbelink
(medical)
Peter Matthews
(technical)
Martin Shaffer
(medical)
Defendant
Michael R. Klein Jr.
(medical)
Alfred French
(medical)
Facts
Plaintiff Margaret Gore was driving on southbound Taylor Road in Rockland in 2003. When her SUV came to a sudden stop due to slowed traffic, she was rear-ended by a tractor-trailer driven by Defendant Johann Hunter. The defendant was driving the tractor in the course of his employment with Defendant J.W. Jacks Trucking Inc. The plaintiff, who was in her 30s, sued Defendant Hunter for negligent operation of a motor vehicle. She also sued Defendant J.W. Jacks under a theory of respondeat superior.
Contentions
PLAINTIFF'S CONTENTIONS:
The plaintiff took the position through eyewitness testimony that her vehicle had come to a stop for several seconds when the defendant rear-ended her. The plaintiff further contended that although the defendants denied liability for the accident during the discovery phase, during trial, they neither admitted nor denied liability. The plaintiff's physicians suggested that the plaintiff suffered from reflex sympathetic dystrophy/complex regional pain syndrome.
DEFENDANT'S CONTENTIONS:
The defendants denied liability for the accident. The defense challenged the plaintiff's physician's claims that she may suffer from reflex sympathetic dystrophy/complex regional pain syndrome. Instead, the defense opined that the plaintiff was making up the claims. A defense expert orthopedist who examined the plaintiff contended that although she was injured in the accident, her injuries were not that serious. Consequently, the defense contended that only damages for soft tissue injuries should be awarded.
Settlement Discussions
The plaintiff demanded $100,000 pursuant to the defendant's insurance policy limits. The defendants offered $151,000 (C.C.P. 998).
Specials in Evidence
The plaintiff sought $1.3 million to $1.7 million for both medical and economic damages.
Damages
The plaintiff sought damages for past and future pain and suffering.
Injuries
The plaintiff was taken to the hospital by ambulance. She claimed injuries to her neck, back, arms and legs. She also claimed she suffered a right knee injury. Although all tests and scans conducted at the hospital came back normal, the plaintiff continued to suffer from pain for which she took heavy pain medications. The plaintiff could not afford to undergo a spinal cord stimulation procedure that her pain management physician recommended.
Result
$30,300. The defendants were found fully liable for the accident.
Deliberation
three hours
Poll
12-0
Length
six days
For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:
Email
jeremy@reprintpros.com
for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390