This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Business Law
Unfair Competition
False Advertising

Dana Bostick, Anita Vasko, Judi Trotter, Beverly Molnar, Chester Cote, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, and on behalf of the general public v. Herbalife International of America Inc., Herbalife International Inc., Herbalife Ltd.

Published: Jul. 3, 2015 | Result Date: Jun. 4, 2015 | Filing Date: Jan. 1, 1900 |

Case number: 2:13-cv-02488-BRO-SH Settlement –  $17,500,000

Court

USDC Central


Attorneys

Plaintiff

Justin P. Karczag
(Encore Law Group LLP)

Scott M. Petersen

Jason W. Hardin

Philip D. Dracht
(Fabian Vancott)

Thomas G. Foley Jr.
(Foley Bezek Behle & Curtis LLP)

Robert A. Curtis
(Foley, Bezek, Behle & Curtis LLP)


Defendant

David L. Zifkin
(Boies Schiller & Flexner LLP)

Mark T. Drooks
(Bird, Marella, Boxer, Wolpert, Nessim, Drooks, Lincenberg & Rhow PC)

Jonathan D. Schiller

Joseph F. Kioetsch

Gopi K. Panchapakesan
(Bird, Marella, Boxer, Wolpert, Nessim, Drooks, Lincenberg & Rhow PC)

A. Howard Matz


Facts

Dana Bostick, Anita Vasko, Judi Trotter, Beverly Molnar, and Chester Cote, filed a class action against Herbalife International of America Inc., Herbalife International Inc., and Herbalife Ltd.

Contentions

PLAINTIFFS' CONTENTIONS:
Plaintiffs are distributors of Herbalife, a multi-level marketing company. Plaintiffs alleged Herbalife, in various promotional materials claimed they would make money as Herbalife distributors. Plaintiffs also alleged Herbalife overcharged its distributors for "Packaging and Handling" and shipping charges. Plaintiffs alleged they lost money on their Herbalife distributorships. Plaintiffs, on behalf of themselves and other U.S. distributors, accused Herbalife of violating California's Endless Chain law and unfair competition laws.

DEFENDANTS' CONTENTIONS:
Herbalife denied the allegations and asserted various affirmative defenses.

Result

The parties settled their dispute for $15 million to fund business opportunity claimants and $2.5 million to fund product returns for a total of $17.5 million in economic value to the class. The court awarded $4.9 million in fees and over $210,000 in expenses. Eligible class members, who were compensated based on their losses claimed on the resale of Herbalife product, received up to 100 percent of their claimed losses, averaging $1,101 with the highest payment being $98,000. A $20 flat rate payment was available to class members that did not purchase over $750 in product from Herbalife.


#115585

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390