This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Torts
Negligence
Product Negligence and Strict Products Liability

Steven Wilson, Christina Wilson v. The Walt Disney Company, Walt Disney Imagineering Research & Development Inc., Walt Disney Parks and Resorts U.S. Inc., Disney Enterprises Inc., Doe 1, Doe 2, Doe 3, Doe 4, Doe 5, Doe 6 and Does 7 through 50

Published: Jan. 10, 2015 | Result Date: Jun. 5, 2014 | Filing Date: Jan. 1, 1900 |

Case number: 2:13-cv-03388-JAK-SH Verdict –  Defense

Court

USDC Central


Attorneys

Plaintiff

Barry B. Novack
(Law Office of Barry B. Novack)

Steven M. Bernstein

Samuel J. Winokur


Defendant

Gary A. Wolensky
(Buchalter APC)

Anne Marie Ellis
(Buchalter)


Facts

Steven Wilson sued The Walt Disney Co., Walt Disney Imagineering Research & Development Inc., Walt Disney Parks and Resorts U.S. Inc., and Disney Enterprises Inc., in connection with an incident that occurred on March 24, 2010.

Contentions

PLAINTIFF'S CONTENTIONS:
Plaintiff alleged that on March 24, 2010, he rode the Splash Mountain Attraction at Disneyland Resort in Anaheim when he fell and suffered injuries as a result. Plaintiff blamed Disney for the accident, and sued Disney for liability. Plaintiff, in particular, alleged that Disney was negligent in failing to "tie off" the Splash Mountain Log before a cast member assisted him out of it, and that the boat was overloaded, causing him to fall. Plaintiff asserted causes of action for negligence, product negligence, strict products liability, and negligent infliction of emotional distress. Plaintiff's wife, Christina Wilson, asserted a claim for loss of consortium.

DEFENDANT'S CONTENTIONS:
Defendant Walt Disney Parks and Resorts disputed plaintiffs' contentions. Specifically, defendants contended that the claimed incident did not occur as described by plaintiffs. Further, defendants contended that plaintiff's preexisting back conditions were not aggravated by the claimed fall. Finally, defendants claimed that the alleged negligence was not a substantial factor in plaintiff's claimed harm.

Result

The jury found Walt Disney Parks and Resorts negligent. However, the jury found that the negligence was not a substantial factor in the alleged harm. Therefore, the jury returned a verdict for the defense.


#116336

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390