This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.

Entertainment Law
Fraud
Motion Picture Profit Participation

Infinite Productions v. Kodiak Films, Inc., et al.

Published: Apr. 6, 1996 | Result Date: Mar. 1, 1996 | Filing Date: Jan. 1, 1900 |

Case number: C670195 –  $2,800,000

Judge

David A. Horowitz

Court

L.A. Superior Central


Attorneys

Plaintiff

Joseph D. Schleimer
(Law Office of Joseph D. Schleimer)


Defendant

Joseph A. Davis


Experts

Plaintiff

James Perry
(technical)

Defendant

Michael D. Goldman
(technical)

Williams Shields
(technical)

Lou Horwitz
(technical)

Facts

In 1984, the plaintiff, Infinite Productions, and its owner, Sherman Hemsley, began production of the motion picture, "Benny and Buford" which was later called "Ghost Fever." The plaintiffs entrusted the film to the defendant, Wolf Schmidt, and his defendant company, Kodiak Films, Inc., to do a rewrite, partial reshoot and then distribute the motion picture. The defendants distributed the picture worldwide but kept 100% of the proceeds. The defendant, Kodiak Films, Inc., filed for bankruptcy and the action proceeded against defendant, Wolf Schmidt, who also filed for bankruptcy prior to trial. The plaintiffs brought this action against the defendants based on fraud and deceit theories of recovery which are not dischargeable in bankruptcy.

Settlement Discussions

The plaintiffs demanded $800,000 (cash) and the defendant offered a structured settlement of $500,000.

Damages

$5,000,0000 (in original prayer). At trial the plaintiffs asked for $2,800,000.

Other Information

The verdict was reached approximately eight years and four months after the case was filed. The defendant intends to file a motion for a new trial _____ (RIGHT??) on the basis that the jury awarded approximately $1,000,000 in legal and accounting fees which are not permissable and the trial judge erred in giving preinstructions to the jury which misstated findings of a reference four years earlier. It is the plaintiffs' contention that the preinstructions were more favorable to the defendants that the courts' findings on the accounting reference, and the $2,800,000 is supported by the evidence as compensatory damages. An accounting reference by the court (C.C.P. º639(a) and (b)) determined that defendants had underreported revenue and taken excessive cost deductions. The jury was preinstructed on these findings.

Deliberation

4 days

Poll

12-0

Length

6 weeks


#116378

For reprint rights or to order a copy of your photo:

Email jeremy@reprintpros.com for prices.
Direct dial: 949-702-5390